From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mkl@pengutronix.de
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:50:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434905444-11438-1-git-send-email-socketcan@hartkopp.net> (raw)
As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=143482089824232&w=2
commit 514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for
overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for
identical CAN skbs.
As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and
netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to
CAN frame loss.
As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch
makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set.
Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the
CAN frame loss so far.
Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
---
drivers/net/can/dev.c | 5 +++++
drivers/net/can/slcan.c | 1 +
drivers/net/can/vcan.c | 3 +++
net/can/af_can.c | 6 +++++-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
index b0f6924..e9b1810 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ unsigned int can_get_echo_skb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int idx)
struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc;
+ if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
+
netif_rx(priv->echo_skb[idx]);
priv->echo_skb[idx] = NULL;
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_can_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct can_frame **cf)
if (unlikely(!skb))
return NULL;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
@@ -603,6 +607,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_canfd_skb(struct net_device *dev,
if (unlikely(!skb))
return NULL;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CANFD);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
index c837eb9..f64f529 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void slc_bump(struct slcan *sl)
if (!skb)
return;
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
skb->dev = sl->dev;
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
index 674f367..0ce868d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static void vcan_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
skb->dev = dev;
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+ if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(skb);
+
netif_rx_ni(skb);
}
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index 32d710e..689c818 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ int can_send(struct sk_buff *skb, int loop)
return err;
}
- if (newskb)
+ if (newskb) {
+ if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64))
+ __net_timestamp(newskb);
+
netif_rx_ni(newskb);
+ }
/* update statistics */
can_stats.tx_frames++;
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-21 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-21 16:50 Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2015-06-21 16:57 ` [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-06-21 17:10 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-22 10:10 ` Manfred Schlaegl
2015-06-22 10:34 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-22 11:49 ` Manfred Schlaegl
2015-06-22 15:09 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434905444-11438-1-git-send-email-socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).