From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] Revert "ipv4: use skb coalescing in defragmentation"
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:37:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436571456-27905-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
This reverts commit 3cc4949269e01f39443d0fcfffb5bc6b47878d45.
There is nothing wrong with coalescing during defragmentation, it
reduces truesize overhead and simplifies things for the receiving
socket (no fraglist walk needed).
However, it also destroys geometry of the original fragments.
While that doesn't cause any breakage (we make sure to not exceed largest
original size) ip_do_fragment contains a 'fastpath' that takes advantage
of a present frag list and results in fragments that (in most cases)
match what was received.
In case its needed the coalescing could be done later, when we're sure
the skb is not forwarded. But discussion during NFWS resulted in
'lets just remove this for now'.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index a50dc6d..4d3fffa 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -522,7 +522,6 @@ static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *prev,
int len;
int ihlen;
int err;
- int sum_truesize;
u8 ecn;
ipq_kill(qp);
@@ -590,32 +589,19 @@ static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *prev,
add_frag_mem_limit(&qp->q, clone->truesize);
}
+ skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list = head->next;
skb_push(head, head->data - skb_network_header(head));
- sum_truesize = head->truesize;
- for (fp = head->next; fp;) {
- bool headstolen;
- int delta;
- struct sk_buff *next = fp->next;
-
- sum_truesize += fp->truesize;
+ for (fp=head->next; fp; fp = fp->next) {
+ head->data_len += fp->len;
+ head->len += fp->len;
if (head->ip_summed != fp->ip_summed)
head->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
else if (head->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
head->csum = csum_add(head->csum, fp->csum);
-
- if (skb_try_coalesce(head, fp, &headstolen, &delta)) {
- kfree_skb_partial(fp, headstolen);
- } else {
- if (!skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list)
- skb_shinfo(head)->frag_list = fp;
- head->data_len += fp->len;
- head->len += fp->len;
- head->truesize += fp->truesize;
- }
- fp = next;
+ head->truesize += fp->truesize;
}
- sub_frag_mem_limit(&qp->q, sum_truesize);
+ sub_frag_mem_limit(&qp->q, head->truesize);
head->next = NULL;
head->dev = dev;
--
2.0.5
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 23:37 Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-07-11 5:01 ` [PATCH -next] Revert "ipv4: use skb coalescing in defragmentation" Eric Dumazet
2015-07-12 4:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436571456-27905-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).