From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] tcp: add in_flight to tcp_skb_cb
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 21:21:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1437538896-1330704-3-git-send-email-brakmo@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437538896-1330704-1-git-send-email-brakmo@fb.com>
Based on comments by Neal Cardwell to tcp_nv patch:
AFAICT this patch would not require an increase in the size of sk_buff
cb[] if it were to take advantage of the fact that the tcp_skb_cb
header.h4 and header.h6 fields are only used in the packet reception
code path, and this in_flight field is only used on the transmit
side. So the in_flight field could be placed in a struct that is
itself placed in a union with the "header" union.
That way the sender code can remember the in_flight value
without requiring any extra space. And in the future other
sender-side info could be stored in the "tx" struct, if needed.
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 13 ++++++++++---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 26e7651..2e62efe 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -755,11 +755,17 @@ struct tcp_skb_cb {
/* 1 byte hole */
__u32 ack_seq; /* Sequence number ACK'd */
union {
- struct inet_skb_parm h4;
+ struct {
+ /* bytes in flight when this packet was sent */
+ __u32 in_flight;
+ } tx; /* only used for outgoing skbs */
+ union {
+ struct inet_skb_parm h4;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
- struct inet6_skb_parm h6;
+ struct inet6_skb_parm h6;
#endif
- } header; /* For incoming frames */
+ } header; /* For incoming skbs */
+ };
};
#define TCP_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct tcp_skb_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
@@ -837,6 +843,7 @@ union tcp_cc_info;
struct ack_sample {
u32 pkts_acked;
s32 rtt_us;
+ u32 in_flight;
};
struct tcp_congestion_ops {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 4f641f6..aca4ae5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3068,6 +3068,7 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets,
long ca_rtt_us = -1L;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u32 pkts_acked = 0;
+ u32 last_in_flight = 0;
bool rtt_update;
int flag = 0;
@@ -3107,6 +3108,7 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets,
if (!first_ackt.v64)
first_ackt = last_ackt;
+ last_in_flight = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tx.in_flight;
reord = min(pkts_acked, reord);
if (!after(scb->end_seq, tp->high_seq))
flag |= FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED;
@@ -3196,7 +3198,8 @@ static int tcp_clean_rtx_queue(struct sock *sk, int prior_fackets,
}
if (icsk->icsk_ca_ops->pkts_acked) {
- struct ack_sample sample = {pkts_acked, ca_rtt_us};
+ struct ack_sample sample = {pkts_acked, ca_rtt_us,
+ last_in_flight};
icsk->icsk_ca_ops->pkts_acked(sk, sample);
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 7105784..e9deab5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -920,9 +920,12 @@ static int tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it,
int err;
BUG_ON(!skb || !tcp_skb_pcount(skb));
+ tp = tcp_sk(sk);
if (clone_it) {
skb_mstamp_get(&skb->skb_mstamp);
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tx.in_flight = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq
+ - tp->snd_una;
if (unlikely(skb_cloned(skb)))
skb = pskb_copy(skb, gfp_mask);
@@ -933,7 +936,6 @@ static int tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it,
}
inet = inet_sk(sk);
- tp = tcp_sk(sk);
tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
memset(&opts, 0, sizeof(opts));
--
1.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-22 4:21 [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] tcp: add NV congestion control Lawrence Brakmo
2015-07-22 4:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] tcp: replace cnt & rtt with struct in pkts_acked() Lawrence Brakmo
2015-07-22 5:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-07-22 11:04 ` Neal Cardwell
2015-07-22 4:21 ` Lawrence Brakmo [this message]
2015-07-22 4:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tcp: add NV congestion control Lawrence Brakmo
2015-07-22 6:50 ` Yuchung Cheng
2015-07-22 11:27 ` Neal Cardwell
2015-07-24 0:47 ` Lawrence Brakmo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1437538896-1330704-3-git-send-email-brakmo@fb.com \
--to=brakmo@fb.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).