From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaixu Xia Subject: [PATCH net-next] bpf: fix the bug "'struct bpf_array' has no member named 'prog'" in s390 architecture Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:00:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1439269224-13266-1-git-send-email-xiakaixu@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: , , , To: , , , , Return-path: Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:33161 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752030AbbHKFAt (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:00:49 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 'Kbuild test robot' sent me an email about a build error "'struct bpf_array' has no member named 'prog'" in s390 architecture. This error is caused by commit: 2a36f0b92eb 638dd023870574eb471b1c56be9ad [656/692] bpf: Make the bpf _prog_array_map more generic. In this patch, the member 'prog' of struct bpf_array has been replaced by 'ptrs'. So this patch fix it. --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 9f4bbc0..eeda051 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0, 0x2); /* - * prog = array->prog[index]; + * prog = array->ptrs[index]; * if (prog == NULL) * goto out; */ @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x000d, REG_1, BPF_REG_3, REG_0, 3); /* lg %r1,prog(%b2,%r1) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, REG_1, BPF_REG_2, - REG_1, offsetof(struct bpf_array, prog)); + REG_1, offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)); /* clgij %r1,0,0x8,label0 */ EMIT6_PCREL_IMM_LABEL(0xec000000, 0x007d, REG_1, 0, 0, 0x8); -- 1.8.3.4