From: Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@intel.com>
To: linux-nfc@lists.01.org,
Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] nfc: nci: Use a separate mutex for nci open and close
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:54:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441119268-30654-8-git-send-email-robert.dolca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441119268-30654-1-git-send-email-robert.dolca@intel.com>
The functions were using req_lock for serialization. Doing so it
prevented the driver from calling nci_request during setup because it uses
the same mutex.
In the open and close functions __nci_request was replaced with nci_request
because it acquires req_lock.
Add test for NCI_INIT bit in nci_request to allow calling the function
during setup.
Signed-off-by: Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@intel.com>
---
include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 3 +++
net/nfc/nci/core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
index d28b7a3..61dcaf2 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h
@@ -266,6 +266,9 @@ struct nci_dev {
/* stored during intf_activated_ntf */
__u8 remote_gb[NFC_MAX_GT_LEN];
__u8 remote_gb_len;
+
+ /* lock used for setup and other nci_ops serialization */
+ struct mutex op_lock;
};
/* ----- NCI Devices ----- */
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
index 6f173cd..5d61b6e 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ inline int nci_request(struct nci_dev *ndev,
{
int rc;
- if (!test_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags))
+ if (!test_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags) &&
+ !test_bit(NCI_INIT, &ndev->flags))
return -ENETDOWN;
/* Serialize all requests */
@@ -383,7 +384,7 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
{
int rc = 0;
- mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&ndev->op_lock);
if (test_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) {
rc = -EALREADY;
@@ -403,8 +404,8 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
rc = ndev->ops->init(ndev);
if (!rc) {
- rc = __nci_request(ndev, nci_reset_req, 0,
- msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_RESET_TIMEOUT));
+ rc = nci_request(ndev, nci_reset_req, 0,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_RESET_TIMEOUT));
}
if (!rc && ndev->ops->setup) {
@@ -412,16 +413,16 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
}
if (!rc) {
- rc = __nci_request(ndev, nci_init_req, 0,
- msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_INIT_TIMEOUT));
+ rc = nci_request(ndev, nci_init_req, 0,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_INIT_TIMEOUT));
}
if (!rc && ndev->ops->post_setup)
rc = ndev->ops->post_setup(ndev);
if (!rc) {
- rc = __nci_request(ndev, nci_init_complete_req, 0,
- msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_INIT_TIMEOUT));
+ rc = nci_request(ndev, nci_init_complete_req, 0,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_INIT_TIMEOUT));
}
clear_bit(NCI_INIT, &ndev->flags);
@@ -441,19 +442,19 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
}
done:
- mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ndev->op_lock);
return rc;
}
static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
{
nci_req_cancel(ndev, ENODEV);
- mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&ndev->op_lock);
if (!test_and_clear_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) {
del_timer_sync(&ndev->cmd_timer);
del_timer_sync(&ndev->data_timer);
- mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ndev->op_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -470,8 +471,8 @@ static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
atomic_set(&ndev->cmd_cnt, 1);
set_bit(NCI_INIT, &ndev->flags);
- __nci_request(ndev, nci_reset_req, 0,
- msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_RESET_TIMEOUT));
+ nci_request(ndev, nci_reset_req, 0,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(NCI_RESET_TIMEOUT));
/* After this point our queues are empty
* and no works are scheduled.
@@ -488,7 +489,7 @@ static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
/* Clear flags */
ndev->flags = 0;
- mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ndev->op_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -1123,6 +1124,7 @@ int nci_register_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
(unsigned long) ndev);
mutex_init(&ndev->req_lock);
+ mutex_init(&ndev->op_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ndev->conn_info_list);
rc = nfc_register_device(ndev->nfc_dev);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 14:54 [PATCH v2 0/9] Adds Intel FieldsPeak NFC solution driver Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] nfc: nci: Export nci data send API Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] nfc: nci: Add function to get max packet size for conn Robert Dolca
[not found] ` <1441119268-30654-1-git-send-email-robert.dolca-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] nfc: nci: Introduce new core opcodes Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] nfc: nci: Add a parameter to get the new connection id Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] nfc: nci: Allow the driver to set handler for core nci ops Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] nfc: nci: Do not call post_setup when setup fails Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] nfc: nci: Introduce nci_core_cmd Robert Dolca
2015-09-01 14:54 ` Robert Dolca [this message]
2015-09-01 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] nfc: Add Intel Fields Peak NFC solution driver Robert Dolca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1441119268-30654-8-git-send-email-robert.dolca@intel.com \
--to=robert.dolca@intel.com \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfc@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).