From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Johnny Strom <johnny.strom@linuxsolutions.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: respect user provided max_queues
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:29:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441794562.24450.266.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150909101628.GK12714@zion.uk.xensource.com>
On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 11:16 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:12:44AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 09/09/15 11:09, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Originally that parameter was always reset to num_online_cpus during
> > > module initialisation, which renders it useless.
> > >
> > > The fix is to only set max_queues to num_online_cpus when user has
> > > not
> > > provided a value.
> > [...]
> > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ module_param(rx_drain_timeout_msecs, uint, 0444);
> > > unsigned int rx_stall_timeout_msecs = 60000;
> > > module_param(rx_stall_timeout_msecs, uint, 0444);
> > >
> > > -unsigned int xenvif_max_queues;
> > > +unsigned int xenvif_max_queues = 0;
> >
> > You don't need this.
> >
> > Otherwise,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> >
> > Is an equivalent fix needed in netfront?
> >
>
> I think so.
>
> I will address your comment
With that: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> and send both fixes (front and back) in a
> series.
>
> Wei.
>
> > David
> >
> > > module_param_named(max_queues, xenvif_max_queues, uint, 0644);
> > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_queues,
> > > "Maximum number of queues per virtual interface");
> > > @@ -2105,8 +2105,11 @@ static int __init netback_init(void)
> > > if (!xen_domain())
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - /* Allow as many queues as there are CPUs, by default */
> > > - xenvif_max_queues = num_online_cpus();
> > > + /* Allow as many queues as there are CPUs if user has not
> > > + * specified a value.
> > > + */
> > > + if (xenvif_max_queues == 0)
> > > + xenvif_max_queues = num_online_cpus();
> > >
> > > if (fatal_skb_slots < XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX) {
> > > pr_info("fatal_skb_slots too small (%d), bump it to
> > > XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX (%d)\n",
> > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-09 10:09 [PATCH net] xen-netback: respect user provided max_queues Wei Liu
2015-09-09 10:12 ` David Vrabel
2015-09-09 10:16 ` Wei Liu
2015-09-09 10:29 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1441794562.24450.266.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=johnny.strom@linuxsolutions.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).