Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix false positives in can_checksum_protocol()

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1606 bytes --]

On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 20:04 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> 
> > I've been pondering a bit of a redesign in this space.  I think the
> > skb struct should be explicit in its instructions to hardware for
> > which offloads to do for each packet.
> >
> > In this way, the stack would be *directly* telling the drivers what to
> > do (and what not to do), solving all sorts of bugs and really improving
> > driver reliability and implementation.
> >
> Doesn't CHECKSUM_PARTIAL with csum_offset and csum_start already tell
> the driver unambiguously what to do wrt checksum offload?

Right. That's precisely what we *do* have. But as things stand, we
can't *use* it to its full capability.

It's fine for decent devices which can handle such explicit
instructions (advertised by the NETIF_F_HW_CSUM feature).

The problem is the crappy devices that can *only* checksum UDP and TCP
frames, advertised with the NETIF_F_IP{V6,}_CSUM features. We make a
primitive attempt *not* to feed arbitrary checksum requests to such
hardware. But we fail — we end up feeding *all* Legacy IP packets to a
NETIF_F_IP_CSUM device, and *all* IPv6 packets to a NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM
device, regardless of whether they're *actually* TCP or UDP packets.

That's the problem I'm trying to solve. And then we *can* make full use
of the generic checksum offload (I had it working for ICMPv6 at one
point: http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2013/01/14/38 ).

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation


[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5691 bytes --]