* [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq
@ 2015-10-06 21:27 clsoto
2015-10-06 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX clsoto
2015-10-08 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq Or Gerlitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: clsoto @ 2015-10-06 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: netdev, ogerlitz, brking, Carol L Soto
From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Test interrupts fails if not all completion vectors called
request_irq. This case can happen if only mlx4_en loads and
we have more completion vectors than rx rings.
Fixes: c66fa19c405a ('net/mlx4: Add EQ pool')
Acked-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c
index 8e81e53..c344884 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c
@@ -1364,6 +1364,10 @@ int mlx4_test_interrupts(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
* and performing a NOP command
*/
for(i = 0; !err && (i < dev->caps.num_comp_vectors); ++i) {
+ /* Make sure request_irq was called */
+ if (!priv->eq_table.eq[i].have_irq)
+ continue;
+
/* Temporary use polling for command completions */
mlx4_cmd_use_polling(dev);
--
Can we push this patch to 4.2-stable as the bug was introduced in 4.2-rc1
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-06 21:27 [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq clsoto
@ 2015-10-06 21:27 ` clsoto
2015-10-06 21:39 ` Or Gerlitz
2015-10-08 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq Or Gerlitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: clsoto @ 2015-10-06 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: netdev, ogerlitz, brking, Carol L Soto
From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
with his own msix interrupt line.
Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
index 006757f..f03f513 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
@@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs - dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
nreq);
- if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
+ if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
nreq = MAX_MSIX;
- shared_ports = true;
- }
entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entries)
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-06 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX clsoto
@ 2015-10-06 21:39 ` Or Gerlitz
2015-10-06 21:46 ` Carol Soto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Or Gerlitz @ 2015-10-06 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carol L Soto, Matan Barak
Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
> with his own msix interrupt line.
so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
please elaborate more on that in your change log.
>
> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
Matan for this patch as well.
Or.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> index 006757f..f03f513 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
> @@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
>
> nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs - dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
> nreq);
> - if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
> + if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
> nreq = MAX_MSIX;
> - shared_ports = true;
> - }
>
> entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!entries)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-06 21:39 ` Or Gerlitz
@ 2015-10-06 21:46 ` Carol Soto
2015-10-07 7:25 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-08 11:54 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Carol Soto @ 2015-10-06 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Or Gerlitz, Matan Barak
Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
>> with his own msix interrupt line.
> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
> please elaborate more on that in your change log.
just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs and
2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will share
the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his own
interrupt line.
>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
> Matan for this patch as well.
Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it.
>
> Or.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> index 006757f..f03f513 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>> @@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
>>
>> nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs - dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
>> nreq);
>> - if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
>> + if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
>> nreq = MAX_MSIX;
>> - shared_ports = true;
>> - }
>>
>> entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!entries)
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-06 21:46 ` Carol Soto
@ 2015-10-07 7:25 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-07 8:08 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-08 11:54 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matan Barak @ 2015-10-07 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carol Soto, Or Gerlitz
Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On 10/7/2015 12:46 AM, Carol Soto wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
>>> with his own msix interrupt line.
>> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
>> please elaborate more on that in your change log.
> just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs and
> 2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will share
> the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his own
> interrupt line.
>
>>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested
>>> MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
>>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
>> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
>> Matan for this patch as well.
> Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it.
The logic seems correct to me. When there are more nreqs than we could
possibly support (or want to support), there’s no reason to share the
EQs between the different ports.
Thanks for your fix.
Regards,
Matan
>>
>> Or.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>> index 006757f..f03f513 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>> @@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev
>>> *dev)
>>>
>>> nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs -
>>> dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
>>> nreq);
>>> - if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
>>> + if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
>>> nreq = MAX_MSIX;
>>> - shared_ports = true;
>>> - }
>>>
>>> entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!entries)
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-07 7:25 ` Matan Barak
@ 2015-10-07 8:08 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-07 14:20 ` Carol Soto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Matan Barak @ 2015-10-07 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carol Soto, Or Gerlitz
Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On 10/7/2015 10:25 AM, Matan Barak wrote:
>
>
> On 10/7/2015 12:46 AM, Carol Soto wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
>>>> with his own msix interrupt line.
>>> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
>>> please elaborate more on that in your change log.
>> just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs and
>> 2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will share
>> the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his own
>> interrupt line.
>>
>>>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested
>>>> MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
>>>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
>>> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
>>> Matan for this patch as well.
>> Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it.
>
> The logic seems correct to me. When there are more nreqs than we could
> possibly support (or want to support), there’s no reason to share the
> EQs between the different ports.
> Thanks for your fix.
>
Please also clean the shared_ports variable - we don't need this anymore.
> Regards,
> Matan
>
>>>
>>> Or.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>> index 006757f..f03f513 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>> @@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev
>>>> *dev)
>>>>
>>>> nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs -
>>>> dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
>>>> nreq);
>>>> - if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
>>>> + if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
>>>> nreq = MAX_MSIX;
>>>> - shared_ports = true;
>>>> - }
>>>>
>>>> entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!entries)
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-07 8:08 ` Matan Barak
@ 2015-10-07 14:20 ` Carol Soto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Carol Soto @ 2015-10-07 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matan Barak, Or Gerlitz
Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On 10/7/2015 3:08 AM, Matan Barak wrote:
>
>
> On 10/7/2015 10:25 AM, Matan Barak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/7/2015 12:46 AM, Carol Soto wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
>>>>> with his own msix interrupt line.
>>>> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
>>>> please elaborate more on that in your change log.
>>> just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs and
>>> 2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will share
>>> the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his own
>>> interrupt line.
>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested
>>>>> MSIXs to MAX_MSIX')
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
>>>> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
>>>> Matan for this patch as well.
>>> Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it.
>>
>> The logic seems correct to me. When there are more nreqs than we could
>> possibly support (or want to support), there’s no reason to share the
>> EQs between the different ports.
>> Thanks for your fix.
>>
>
> Please also clean the shared_ports variable - we don't need this anymore.
>
Thanks for the feedback, will resend.
Carol
>> Regards,
>> Matan
>>
>>>>
>>>> Or.
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>>> index 006757f..f03f513 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c
>>>>> @@ -2673,10 +2673,8 @@ static void mlx4_enable_msi_x(struct mlx4_dev
>>>>> *dev)
>>>>>
>>>>> nreq = min_t(int, dev->caps.num_eqs -
>>>>> dev->caps.reserved_eqs,
>>>>> nreq);
>>>>> - if (nreq > MAX_MSIX) {
>>>>> + if (nreq > MAX_MSIX)
>>>>> nreq = MAX_MSIX;
>>>>> - shared_ports = true;
>>>>> - }
>>>>>
>>>>> entries = kcalloc(nreq, sizeof *entries,
>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> if (!entries)
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-08 11:54 ` David Miller
@ 2015-10-08 11:49 ` Or Gerlitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Or Gerlitz @ 2015-10-08 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, clsoto; +Cc: gerlitz.or, matanb, netdev, brking
On 10/8/2015 2:54 PM, David Miller wrote:
> Also please fix you subject to have a proper "mlx4: " subsystem prefix.
Carol, I have the patch and will submit it with other fixes that we have.
Or.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq
2015-10-06 21:27 [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq clsoto
2015-10-06 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX clsoto
@ 2015-10-08 11:51 ` Or Gerlitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Or Gerlitz @ 2015-10-08 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carol L Soto; +Cc: David Miller, Linux Netdev List, Or Gerlitz, brking
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Test interrupts fails if not all completion vectors called
> request_irq. This case can happen if only mlx4_en loads and
> we have more completion vectors than rx rings.
>
> Fixes: c66fa19c405a ('net/mlx4: Add EQ pool')
> Acked-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Here too, I will submit this with other fixes we have, thanks a lot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX
2015-10-06 21:46 ` Carol Soto
2015-10-07 7:25 ` Matan Barak
@ 2015-10-08 11:54 ` David Miller
2015-10-08 11:49 ` Or Gerlitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-10-08 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clsoto; +Cc: gerlitz.or, matanb, netdev, ogerlitz, brking
From: Carol Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:46:06 -0500
>
>
> On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> From: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring
>>> with his own msix interrupt line.
>> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal?
>> please elaborate more on that in your change log.
> just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs
> and 2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will
> share the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his
> own interrupt line.
>
>>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested MSIXs
>>> to MAX_MSIX')
>>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch
>> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from
>> Matan for this patch as well.
> Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it.
Also please fix you subject to have a proper "mlx4: " subsystem prefix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-08 11:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-06 21:27 [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq clsoto
2015-10-06 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Do not set shared_ports when nreq > MAX_MSIX clsoto
2015-10-06 21:39 ` Or Gerlitz
2015-10-06 21:46 ` Carol Soto
2015-10-07 7:25 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-07 8:08 ` Matan Barak
2015-10-07 14:20 ` Carol Soto
2015-10-08 11:54 ` David Miller
2015-10-08 11:49 ` Or Gerlitz
2015-10-08 11:51 ` [PATCH 1/2 net] net/mlx4_core: Test interrupts fail if not all comp vectors called request_irq Or Gerlitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).