From: "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
To: "xerofoify@gmail.com" <xerofoify@gmail.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Spinadel, David" <david.spinadel@intel.com>,
"Dreyfuss, Haim" <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>,
"Bondar, Alexander" <alexander.bondar@intel.com>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"Stern, Avraham" <avraham.stern@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi:Fix incorrect fallthrough in switch statement in the function iwl_mvm_check_running_scans
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:30:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444293021.2899.46.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442967859-16347-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 20:24 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes incorrect fallthrough in the switch statment checking
> the scan type passed by the caller to iwl_mvm_check_running_scans
> for the switch case IWL_MVM_SCAN_SCHED to return directly after
> the call to iwl_mvm_scan_stop in order to avoid fallthrough into
> the next case and incorrectly return zero indicating success to
> the caller even if the function call to iwl_mvm_scan_stop fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> ---
Applied to our internal tree with a modified commit message.
Thanks!
--
Luca.
parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1442967859-16347-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444293021.2899.46.camel@intel.com \
--to=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.bondar@intel.com \
--cc=avraham.stern@intel.com \
--cc=david.spinadel@intel.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=haim.dreyfuss@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xerofoify@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).