From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Killing USBNET as an independent Konfig option
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:45:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444819531.1975.2.camel@suse.com> (raw)
Hi,
would anybody mind me killing the separate config option
of usbnet? I can see no sense in having it as a separate
option, as it is just infrastructure.
Regards
Oliver
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 10:45 Oliver Neukum [this message]
2015-10-14 14:16 ` Killing USBNET as an independent Konfig option Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444819531.1975.2.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).