From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] tcp: Redundant Data Bundling (RDB) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 05:57:25 -0700 Message-ID: <1445691445.22974.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1445633413-3532-1-git-send-email-bro.devel+kernel@gmail.com> <61F74109-9FDC-485A-978B-714B7AA27445@ifi.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Yuchung Cheng , Bendik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F8nning?= Opstad , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Jonathan Corbet , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Tom Herbert , Paolo Abeni , Erik Kline , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Al Viro , Jiri Pirko , Alexander Duyck , Florian Westphal , Daniel Lee , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Daniel Borkmann , Willem de Bruijn , Linus =?ISO-8859- To: Jonas Markussen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <61F74109-9FDC-485A-978B-714B7AA27445-6miFZF/5cTBuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 08:00 +0000, Jonas Markussen wrote: > Repacketization is only on retransmissions; RDB bundles previously se= nt segments with the next =E2=80=9Cnormal=E2=80=9D transmission instead= =2E=20 >=20 > This makes the flow recover the lost segment before a retransmission= is triggered by an RTO or fast retransmit. Thank you for this very high quality patch submission. Please give us a few days for proper evaluation. Thanks !