From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Artem S. Tashkinov" Subject: Re: A call to revise sockets behaviour Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <144572220.42656.1375119116406.JavaMail.mail@webmail09> References: <2066879158.39771.1375110634453.JavaMail.mail@webmail09><20130729083519.5d574f16@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <2063167407.40450.1375112877907.JavaMail.mail@webmail09><51F6A5E2.5050100@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rick.jones2@hp.com Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0046.b.hostedemail.com ([64.98.42.46]:58121 "EHLO smtprelay.b.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758325Ab3G2RcD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:32:03 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jul 29, 2013 11:27:00 PM, rick wrote: >> A wine developer clearly showed that this option simply doesn't work. >> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26031#c21 >> >> Output of strace: >> getsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [0], [4]) = 0 >> setsockopt(24, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 >> bind(24, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(43012), sin_addr=inet_addr("0. >> 0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EADDRINUSE (Address already in use) > >The output of netstat -an didn't by any chance happen to still show an >endpoint in the LISTEN state for that port number did it? > >rick jones > By chance - no, nothing is/was listening. You can recreate this test in an order of few minutes without ever trusting my word.