From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jitendra Kumar Khasdev <jkhasdev@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, linus.luessing@c0d3.bluen,
hannes@stressinduktion.org, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jitendra Kumar Khasdev <jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: net: core: skbuff.c: Added do-while pair for complex macros
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:00:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448557223.18647.4.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448555763-5088-1-git-send-email-jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com>
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:06 +0530, Jitendra Kumar Khasdev wrote:
> This patch is to file skbuff.c that fixes up following error,
> reported by checkpatch.pl tool,
Your subject title is not correct.
This is not a staging patch.
> 1. ERROR: Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed
> in a do - while loop.
checkpatch is brainless.
Not every message it emits needs fixing.
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
[]
> @@ -748,11 +748,13 @@ void consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(consume_skb);
>
> /* Make sure a field is enclosed inside headers_start/headers_end section */
> -#define CHECK_SKB_FIELD(field) \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) < \
> - offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_start)); \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) > \
> - offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end)); \
> +#define CHECK_SKB_FIELD(field) \
> + do { \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) < \
> + offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_start)); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) > \
> + offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end)); \
> + } while (0) \
Perhaps the last check should add a sizeof(field)
BUILD_BUG_ON((offsetof(struct sk_buff, field) +
FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, field)) >
offsetof(struct sk_buff, headers_end));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 16:36 [PATCH] staging: net: core: skbuff.c: Added do-while pair for complex macros Jitendra Kumar Khasdev
2015-11-26 17:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-11-26 21:43 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448557223.18647.4.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jitendra.khasdev@hotwaxsystems.com \
--cc=jkhasdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.luessing@c0d3.bluen \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).