netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] Had to revert bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:28:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451.1262813287@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B44FC2B.4090505@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

>Le 06/01/2010 19:38, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> 
>> (net-next-2.6 doesnt work well on my bond/vlan setup, I suspect I need a bisection)
>
>David, I had to revert 1f3c8804acba841b5573b953f5560d2683d2db0d
>(bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation)
>
>Or else, my vlan devices dont work (unfortunatly I dont have much time
>these days to debug the thing)
>
>My config :
>
>              +---------+
>vlan.103 -----+ bond0   +--- eth1 (bnx2)
>              |         +
>vlan.825 -----+         +--- eth2 (tg3)
>              +---------+

	I'm looking into this right now; I'm seeing what I suspect is
the same thing: the ARP traffic for the probes is processed, and the
bonding slaves are marked up, but any other incoming traffic on the VLAN
is dropped.  It might be that just the incoming ARP replies are lost;
I'm not sure yet.  Tcpdump clearly shows the traffic from the peer
arriving.

	This is the patch we put in last week that worked for Andy, but
not for me.  Earlier versions worked fine, so this might be something in
the last version.  With Eric now having issues, perhaps this isn't just
my problem.  Perhaps there's some difference in our configurations that
differs from what Andy has.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20 23:28 [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:50   ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21  0:05     ` David Miller
2009-11-21  0:12       ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21  0:40         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-20 23:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-20 23:53   ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:56   ` David Miller
2009-12-17 21:04   ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06  1:32     ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06  5:54       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06  7:56         ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 18:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:10           ` [BUG net-next-2.6] Had to revert bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:28             ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2010-01-06 21:34               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:38             ` David Miller
2010-01-06 21:45               ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 22:56             ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] fix " Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 23:53               ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-01-07  8:37                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07  8:41                   ` David Miller
2010-01-06 22:54           ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-07  9:15             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07 17:42               ` rps: some comments Eric Dumazet
2010-01-08  0:07                 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-08  6:27                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-11  6:25               ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-11  9:00                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-14  4:40                   ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-21  0:04   ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21  8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-21  9:03   ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21  9:31     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1451.1262813287@death.nxdomain.ibm.com \
    --to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).