From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Seering Subject: Re: [PATCH] appletalk: Pass IP-over-DDP packets through when 'ipddp0' interface is not present Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:16:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1453079782.5666.19.camel@seering.org> References: <1452832847.1707.42.camel@seering.org> <20160117.192512.1143911903923641150.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.35]:49119 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065AbcARBSg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:18:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160117.192512.1143911903923641150.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > New features are not allowed to be submitted at this time because > the net-next tree is closed. Thanks for explaining; apologies. I was following the instructions in "Documentation/SubmittingPatches". > > Please pay attention to the netdev mailing list announcements to > learn when the net-next tree is open again and new features and > cleanups are allowed to be submitted again. Is the cadence described in "Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt" accurate and sufficient? (netdev is much too high-volume for me, unfortunately.)