From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] lwt: fix rx checksum setting for lwt devices tunneling over ipv6 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:14:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1455729280.5509.64.camel@redhat.com> References: <20160216.154555.1807667652677383104.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jbenc@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pshelar@nicira.com, tgraf@suug.ch, jesse@kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57240 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422669AbcBQROo (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:14:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160216.154555.1807667652677383104.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 15:40 -0500, David Miller wrote: > > Oh yes, I'm mixing different parts of the conversation. We must > > accept on RX zero checksum fields even for ipv6 because of the way the > > VXLAN RFC is worded, correct. > > Paolo, can you please respin your patch against 'net'? I get rejects. Sure. I'll resubmit soon, Paolo