From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix order of flag descriptions
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:29:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1458322179.26915.2.camel@perches.com>
References: <1458317369-28185-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
	 <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>=20
> I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl w=
as giving
> a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the w=
rong order
> breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below checkpatc=
h.pl does
> not complain about this flag descriptions anymore.

checkpatch complains? =A0About what?