From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix order of flag descriptions Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:46:03 -0700 Message-ID: <1458323163.26915.8.camel@perches.com> References: <1458317369-28185-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <1458322179.26915.2.camel@perches.com> <56EC3DA6.2090105@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Luis de Bethencourt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56EC3DA6.2090105@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 17:40 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On 18/03/16 17:29, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > > > Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. [] > > > I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.= pl was giving > > > a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because t= he wrong order > > > breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below check= patch.pl does > > > not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. > > checkpatch complains?=A0=A0About what? > warning: Enum value 'RX_FLAG_DUP_VALIDATED' not described in enum 'ma= c80211_rx_flags' That's not a checkpatch warning. cheers, Joe