From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] wireless: ti: Convert specialized logging macros to kernel style Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:36:31 -0700 Message-ID: <1459373791.25110.132.camel@perches.com> References: <87shz85gkq.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Kalle Valo Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0149.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.149]:47035 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653AbcC3Vgf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:36:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87shz85gkq.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 14:51 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Joe Perches writes: > > Using the normal kernel logging mechanisms makes this code > > a bit more like other wireless drivers. > Personally I don't see the point but I don't have any strong opinions. A > bigger problem is that TI drivers are not really in active development > and that's I'm not thrilled to take big patches like this for dormant > drivers. Not very dormant. 35 patches in the last year, most of them adding functionality.