From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, samanthakumar@google.com,
edumazet@google.com, willemb@google.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] sock: convert sk_peek_offset functions to WRITE_ONCE
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:29:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459726193-20863-2-git-send-email-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459726193-20863-1-git-send-email-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Make the peek offset interface safe to use in lockless environments.
Use READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE to avoid race conditions between testing
and updating the peek offset.
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 255d3e0..6435f6d 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -458,26 +458,28 @@ struct sock {
static inline int sk_peek_offset(struct sock *sk, int flags)
{
- if ((flags & MSG_PEEK) && (sk->sk_peek_off >= 0))
- return sk->sk_peek_off;
- else
- return 0;
+ if (unlikely(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
+ s32 off = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
+ if (off >= 0)
+ return off;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static inline void sk_peek_offset_bwd(struct sock *sk, int val)
{
- if (sk->sk_peek_off >= 0) {
- if (sk->sk_peek_off >= val)
- sk->sk_peek_off -= val;
- else
- sk->sk_peek_off = 0;
+ s32 off = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off);
+
+ if (unlikely(off >= 0)) {
+ off = max_t(s32, off - val, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_peek_off, off);
}
}
static inline void sk_peek_offset_fwd(struct sock *sk, int val)
{
- if (sk->sk_peek_off >= 0)
- sk->sk_peek_off += val;
+ sk_peek_offset_bwd(sk, -val);
}
/*
--
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-03 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-03 23:29 [PATCH net-next 0/4] udp: support SO_PEEK_OFFSET Willem de Bruijn
2016-04-03 23:29 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2016-04-03 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] udp: remove headers from UDP packets before queueing Willem de Bruijn
2016-04-03 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] udp: enable MSG_PEEK at non-zero offset Willem de Bruijn
2016-04-03 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] udp: move peek offset on read and peek Willem de Bruijn
2016-04-04 21:49 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] udp: support SO_PEEK_OFFSET David Miller
2016-04-04 22:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459726193-20863-2-git-send-email-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samanthakumar@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).