netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, tom@herbertland.com,
	jesse@kernel.org, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:59:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460185149.2982.6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160408210103.13096.77973.stgit@ahduyck-xeon-server>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1711 bytes --]

On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 17:06 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> So these are the patches needed to enable tunnel segmentation
> offloads on
> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers.  In addition this patch
> extends
> the i40e and i40evf drivers to include segmentation support for
> tunnels
> with outer checksums.
> 
> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant. 
> In the
> case of i40e a tunnel with outer checksums showed the following
> improvement:
> Throughput Throughput  Local Local   Result 
>            Units       CPU   Service Tag    
>                        Util  Demand         
>                        %                    
> 14066.29   10^6bits/s  3.49  0.651   "before" 
> 20618.16   10^6bits/s  3.09  0.393   "after"
> 
> For ixgbe similar results were seen:
> Throughput Throughput  Local  Local   Result 
>            Units       CPU    Service Tag    
>                        Util   Demand         
>                        %               
> 12879.89   10^6bits/s  10.00  0.763   "before"
> 14286.77   10^6bits/s  5.74   0.395   "after" 
> 
> These patches all rely on the TSO_MANGLEID and GSO_PARTIAL patches so
> I
> would not recommend applying them until those patches have first been
> applied.

Sorry I did not see this until after I tried applying your series. :-(

Maybe the two dependent patches should have been in the series, so I
and others do not waste their time.  Or not send this until the two
patches were accepted.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-09  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-08 20:33 [net-next PATCH 0/5] GRO Fixed IPv4 ID support and GSO partial support Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 20:33 ` [net-next PATCH 1/5] ethtool: Add support for toggling any of the GSO offloads Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 20:33 ` [net-next PATCH 2/5] GSO: Add GSO type for fixed IPv4 ID Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 21:41   ` Jesse Gross
2016-04-08 22:12     ` Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 20:33 ` [net-next PATCH 3/5] GRO: Add support for TCP with fixed IPv4 ID field, limit tunnel IP ID values Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 20:33 ` [net-next PATCH 4/5] GSO: Support partial segmentation offload Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 20:33 ` [net-next PATCH 5/5] Documentation: Add documentation for TSO and GSO features Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 21:06 ` [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers Alexander Duyck
2016-04-08 21:06   ` [next-queue PATCH 1/3] i40e/i40evf: Add support for GSO partial with UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM and GRE_CSUM Alexander Duyck
2016-04-09  6:51     ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-04-08 21:06   ` [next-queue PATCH 2/3] ixgbe/ixgbevf: Add support for GSO partial Alexander Duyck
2016-04-09  6:53     ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-04-08 21:06   ` [next-queue PATCH 3/3] igb/igbvf: " Alexander Duyck
2016-04-09  6:59   ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2016-04-09 15:41     ` [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460185149.2982.6.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).