From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: add __sock_wfree() helper
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 10:56:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462211787.5535.269.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Hosts sending lot of ACK packets exhibit high sock_wfree() cost
because of cache line miss to test SOCK_USE_WRITE_QUEUE
We could move this flag close to sk_wmem_alloc but it is better
to perform the atomic_sub_and_test() on a clean cache line,
as it avoid one extra bus transaction.
skb_orphan_partial() can also have a fast track for packets that either
are TCP acks, or already went through another skb_orphan_partial()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 1 +
net/core/sock.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 3df778ccaa820b00b4038feedae30cd444e9a212..9be2ffb4b8fcf54cc9c8bd73628dd7572b1d783d 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1434,6 +1434,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority);
struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force,
gfp_t priority);
+void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb);
void sock_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index e16a5db853c6f455b0ac826744d0ee5e96a44863..e1151f11eb4aa0a5afa95bfee9d00a85c4d50af6 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1655,6 +1655,17 @@ void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_wfree);
+/* This variant of sock_wfree() is used by TCP,
+ * since it sets SOCK_USE_WRITE_QUEUE.
+ */
+void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
+
+ if (atomic_sub_and_test(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc))
+ __sk_free(sk);
+}
+
void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
{
skb_orphan(skb);
@@ -1677,8 +1688,21 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w);
+/* This helper is used by netem, as it can hold packets in its
+ * delay queue. We want to allow the owner socket to send more
+ * packets, as if they were already TX completed by a typical driver.
+ * But we also want to keep skb->sk set because some packet schedulers
+ * rely on it (sch_fq for example). So we set skb->truesize to a small
+ * amount (1) and decrease sk_wmem_alloc accordingly.
+ */
void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ /* If this skb is a TCP pure ACK or already went here,
+ * we have nothing to do. 2 is already a very small truesize.
+ */
+ if (skb->truesize <= 2)
+ return;
+
/* TCP stack sets skb->ooo_okay based on sk_wmem_alloc,
* so we do not completely orphan skb, but transfert all
* accounted bytes but one, to avoid unexpected reorders.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 1a487ff95d4c0572737e4f972666229f12ef1e08..778ac8f2d84be389478e4d92335e1979482b3817 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it,
skb_orphan(skb);
skb->sk = sk;
- skb->destructor = skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb) ? sock_wfree : tcp_wfree;
+ skb->destructor = skb_is_tcp_pure_ack(skb) ? __sock_wfree : tcp_wfree;
skb_set_hash_from_sk(skb, sk);
atomic_add(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-02 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-02 17:56 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2016-05-03 20:02 ` [PATCH net-next] net: add __sock_wfree() helper David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462211787.5535.269.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox