From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:31:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1463614306.2713.101.camel@intel.com> References: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1463606878.2713.68.camel@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/Dg8YstmWMiEyxsh8RMM" Cc: Alexander Duyck , Tom Herbert , intel-wired-lan , Netdev , Kernel Team , David Miller To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:2241 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751386AbcERXbx (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 19:31:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-/Dg8YstmWMiEyxsh8RMM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:19 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kirsher > wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> This patch series is meant to be applied after: > >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 > >> tunneling > >> > >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 > and > >> is > >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based > GRE > >> tunnels. > >> > >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the > >> Intel > >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.=C2= =A0 I > >> have > >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e > >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is > still > >> passing traffic at around the same rate.=C2=A0 I plan to do further te= sting > >> but > >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be > able > >> to > >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware > >> offloads. > >> > >> --- > >> > >> Alexander Duyck (2): > >>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation= offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled > >> with FOU/GUE > >>=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-= IP offload > > > > Dave, I have this series added to my queue. >=20 > Jeff, >=20 > If Tom's patches make it in for 4.7, then I would like to see if we > could push these patches for "net" since essentially the first patch > is a fix for Tom's earlier patches and the second is needed in order > to really be able to test Tom's patches with a driver that actually > supports a hardware offload. Yeah, I was thinking that very same thing. =C2=A0I will wait to see if Dave sucks this into 4.7 or not and plan accordingly. =C2=A0I also figured out t= hat your two patch series needs to have Tom's series applied before hand, so I will be adding Tom's series to my tree just for testing purposes. --=-/Dg8YstmWMiEyxsh8RMM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXPPtiAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OMfQP/0eQcvSYWZ68Cb+3lNy/htHZ 1/4A8FzzzvrecaIyZUB1IahJit0lnqRVtcPKEEfwpj+QpZnX9k4WUhRlBBhw5J8+ tHNkZPK5tMfxOO51VV2nPg/4R7XwYw6wQFk/x5d2qOeaY3TUfEOFGGEsr7dNNCnP rb2OvpExUphXLTmWviBWCwBRPQqNeiX+4PI23LiXRBT/giBs+9Pnt6bZvEv03Gux Of4Pr8c4BSsTkRw5nBDVgoVDHG0PoF8+KPbThpJ+FTExOoAODE+riY3C5DzUHNqu MNY5tSnr2v6t3n5zLvhevRTb4Unmoc0duo+EsN4HfE0dRkAQE7+eALIbMuLHNBFs 0LhdYVEom/jOd8CiEoAupljpZGZvF59ZAXG4aGXeNip4Om2x6FQgtmY8b16LcaoD aaeHH8IHXA7IUh5dkDukxZHxSd9C78l+qUmeUjAqHEA37FLzVPhJglESJjSsekmq EoYtPNaJ0nJqBx6vaO/xn7cGoZdBIc4HUVBNBvwR/21/cYULX645274U8F1s6qn4 +AiKL0kDrMRYbaOM7//nRBXLL+CwjgBG77rtPZwLQ7S7wFmRHf7CzhdXk5hdjM47 UWegaOebc2FCYag7v2crurunG/n1HnUcy3/uKPmWnow1LmWFutsT5iOhVoFFigt1 0jGms+Cn7Ks1EXLeXOeg =9oeV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/Dg8YstmWMiEyxsh8RMM--