From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:14:32 -0700 Message-ID: <1464110072.2631.13.camel@intel.com> References: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1463606878.2713.68.camel@intel.com> <20160518.211043.773402183440053556.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hf3+QYiNU+uYzQpR39ht" Cc: aduyck@mirantis.com, tom@herbertland.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:49202 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750769AbcEXROr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 13:14:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160518.211043.773402183440053556.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-hf3+QYiNU+uYzQpR39ht Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 21:10 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Jeff Kirsher > Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:27:58 -0700 >=20 > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> This patch series is meant to be applied after: > >> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 > >> tunneling > >>=C2=A0 > >> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 > and > >> is > >> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based > GRE > >> tunnels. > >>=C2=A0 > >> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the > >> Intel > >> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.=C2= =A0 I > >> have > >> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e > >> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is > still > >> passing traffic at around the same rate.=C2=A0 I plan to do further te= sting > >> but > >> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be > able > >> to > >> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware > >> offloads. > >>=C2=A0 > >> --- > >>=C2=A0 > >> Alexander Duyck (2): > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offl= oads GRE_CSUM is enabled > >> with FOU/GUE > >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP of= fload > >=C2=A0 > > Dave, I have this series added to my queue. >=20 > Why would you if it depends upon Tom's series, as mentioned above, which > isn't even in my tree yet? I was not able to apply his patches to my dev-queue due to conflicts and from discussion with Alex, I made the mistake in assuming the issues I saw was because it did not have Tom's driver changes. --=-hf3+QYiNU+uYzQpR39ht Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXRIv4AAoJEOVv75VaS+3Ory4P/AjSaguGw9xt5bKo4kxp5mxo j/n8vYjo/3PjW/TPZ37A3LRI7t8jEhZYDRbGhtlJG+bodqtr/0KuNRoAgJzMRMuX SL7P4dXLwgLcVqyBxSE2uw9cyphXUbKDKSv8Hsxchl5wrPtEp67edRN7/idboRTv MKl0vrzucuhhvRwaia84Nh0YzXLiUVgX80HDYn4PH4pCCybPo/Tbj/Agwr2N20SR F3o4VA5wPwIQ+Q7f2F45R2uSAkIQipATE30JSAKgRRWkpQVollHULlMw319P3hkL +rsyx6GKK/KXLgQgc8cfST2xTpudvSLTnrHoPbY+nv9wJbUPBb7VSK3SkLdFi8a9 mSUBQbEFZNbcVDvwlqp506qRVvXdwKPnh96PjuDGPAkuFle9wvvqnEEX52wQg5da 04aPgar4RgHN08CFnzwoU8La2rAfgKnBNlcvP+myH9+uyCP0eQDN3AFyP0d35wzT 8YG8jdtW+SJwLrrKiKussBczd8nfq43kQ+cJfMIuS2diY1wDle8iGu1CE1R4r9db 3ByHZadGGPkbzUSACde27iirNFUUQ7Ja8PdtIAprC1o9w4lE/Ckt/SlAUsaGcDBN pXIIL4VxXDMtWMPC2NFisR6olGn1SmdgQ69uzgJe/ZFtCUTyF1Tp9h/Twg9ME/jr HT5+h+mS1foLGlv654Ok =4vek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hf3+QYiNU+uYzQpR39ht--