netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <Ariel.Elior@qlogic.com>,
	<Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: qede_poll refactoring
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:35:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467268522-24589-3-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467268522-24589-1-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com>

This patch cleanups qede_poll() routine a bit
and allows qede_poll() to do single iteration to handle
TX completion [As under heavy TX load qede_poll() might
run for indefinite time in the while(1) loop for TX
completion processing and cause CPU stuck].

Signed-off-by: Manish <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 77 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
index f476cd0..ab811e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
@@ -1597,56 +1597,49 @@ next_cqe: /* don't consume bd rx buffer */
 
 static int qede_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 {
-	int work_done = 0;
 	struct qede_fastpath *fp = container_of(napi, struct qede_fastpath,
-						 napi);
+						napi);
 	struct qede_dev *edev = fp->edev;
+	int rx_work_done = 0;
+	u8 tc;
 
-	while (1) {
-		u8 tc;
-
-		for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
-			if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
-				qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
-
-		if (qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq)) {
-			work_done += qede_rx_int(fp, budget - work_done);
-
-			/* must not complete if we consumed full budget */
-			if (work_done >= budget)
-				break;
-		}
+	for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
+		if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
+			qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
+
+	rx_work_done = qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ?
+			qede_rx_int(fp, budget) : 0;
+	if (rx_work_done < budget) {
+		qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
+		/* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
+		 * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
+		 * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
+		 * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
+		 * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
+		 * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
+		 * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
+		 * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
+		 * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
+		 * will never be another interrupt until there is
+		 * another update of the status block, while there
+		 * is still unhandled work.
+		 */
+		rmb();
 
 		/* Fall out from the NAPI loop if needed */
-		if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) || qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
-			qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
-			/* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
-			 * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
-			 * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
-			 * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
-			 * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
-			 * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
-			 * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
-			 * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
-			 * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
-			 * will never be another interrupt until there is
-			 * another update of the status block, while there
-			 * is still unhandled work.
-			 */
-			rmb();
-
-			if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
-			      qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
-				napi_complete(napi);
-				/* Update and reenable interrupts */
-				qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
-					   1 /*update*/);
-				break;
-			}
+		if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
+		      qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
+			napi_complete(napi);
+
+			/* Update and reenable interrupts */
+			qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
+				   1 /*update*/);
+		} else {
+			rx_work_done = budget;
 		}
 	}
 
-	return work_done;
+	return rx_work_done;
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t qede_msix_fp_int(int irq, void *fp_cookie)
-- 
2.7.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-30  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-30  6:35 [PATCH net-next 0/5] qede: Enhancements Manish Chopra
2016-06-30  6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] qede: Add support for handling IP fragmented packets Manish Chopra
2016-06-30  6:35 ` Manish Chopra [this message]
2016-06-30  6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] qede: Utilize xmit_more Manish Chopra
2016-06-30  6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] qede: Add get/set rx copy break tunable support Manish Chopra
2016-06-30  6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] qede: Bump up driver version to 8.10.1.20 Manish Chopra
2016-07-01  9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] qede: Enhancements David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467268522-24589-3-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com \
    --to=manish.chopra@qlogic.com \
    --cc=Ariel.Elior@qlogic.com \
    --cc=Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).