From: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <Ariel.Elior@qlogic.com>,
<Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: qede_poll refactoring
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 02:35:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467268522-24589-3-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467268522-24589-1-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
This patch cleanups qede_poll() routine a bit
and allows qede_poll() to do single iteration to handle
TX completion [As under heavy TX load qede_poll() might
run for indefinite time in the while(1) loop for TX
completion processing and cause CPU stuck].
Signed-off-by: Manish <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 77 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
index f476cd0..ab811e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
@@ -1597,56 +1597,49 @@ next_cqe: /* don't consume bd rx buffer */
static int qede_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
- int work_done = 0;
struct qede_fastpath *fp = container_of(napi, struct qede_fastpath,
- napi);
+ napi);
struct qede_dev *edev = fp->edev;
+ int rx_work_done = 0;
+ u8 tc;
- while (1) {
- u8 tc;
-
- for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
- if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
- qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
-
- if (qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq)) {
- work_done += qede_rx_int(fp, budget - work_done);
-
- /* must not complete if we consumed full budget */
- if (work_done >= budget)
- break;
- }
+ for (tc = 0; tc < edev->num_tc; tc++)
+ if (qede_txq_has_work(&fp->txqs[tc]))
+ qede_tx_int(edev, &fp->txqs[tc]);
+
+ rx_work_done = qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ?
+ qede_rx_int(fp, budget) : 0;
+ if (rx_work_done < budget) {
+ qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
+ /* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
+ * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
+ * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
+ * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
+ * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
+ * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
+ * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
+ * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
+ * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
+ * will never be another interrupt until there is
+ * another update of the status block, while there
+ * is still unhandled work.
+ */
+ rmb();
/* Fall out from the NAPI loop if needed */
- if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) || qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
- qed_sb_update_sb_idx(fp->sb_info);
- /* *_has_*_work() reads the status block,
- * thus we need to ensure that status block indices
- * have been actually read (qed_sb_update_sb_idx)
- * prior to this check (*_has_*_work) so that
- * we won't write the "newer" value of the status block
- * to HW (if there was a DMA right after
- * qede_has_rx_work and if there is no rmb, the memory
- * reading (qed_sb_update_sb_idx) may be postponed
- * to right before *_ack_sb). In this case there
- * will never be another interrupt until there is
- * another update of the status block, while there
- * is still unhandled work.
- */
- rmb();
-
- if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
- qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
- napi_complete(napi);
- /* Update and reenable interrupts */
- qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
- 1 /*update*/);
- break;
- }
+ if (!(qede_has_rx_work(fp->rxq) ||
+ qede_has_tx_work(fp))) {
+ napi_complete(napi);
+
+ /* Update and reenable interrupts */
+ qed_sb_ack(fp->sb_info, IGU_INT_ENABLE,
+ 1 /*update*/);
+ } else {
+ rx_work_done = budget;
}
}
- return work_done;
+ return rx_work_done;
}
static irqreturn_t qede_msix_fp_int(int irq, void *fp_cookie)
--
2.7.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 6:35 [PATCH net-next 0/5] qede: Enhancements Manish Chopra
2016-06-30 6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] qede: Add support for handling IP fragmented packets Manish Chopra
2016-06-30 6:35 ` Manish Chopra [this message]
2016-06-30 6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] qede: Utilize xmit_more Manish Chopra
2016-06-30 6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] qede: Add get/set rx copy break tunable support Manish Chopra
2016-06-30 6:35 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] qede: Bump up driver version to 8.10.1.20 Manish Chopra
2016-07-01 9:43 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] qede: Enhancements David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467268522-24589-3-git-send-email-manish.chopra@qlogic.com \
--to=manish.chopra@qlogic.com \
--cc=Ariel.Elior@qlogic.com \
--cc=Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).