From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] bnxt_en: Improve ntuple filters by checking destination MAC address.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:33:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469464417-786-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469464417-786-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Include the destination MAC address in the ntuple filter structure. The
current code assumes that the destination MAC address is always the MAC
address of the NIC. This may not be true if there are macvlans, for
example. Add destination MAC address checking and configure the filter
correctly using the correct index for the destination MAC address.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 8a0165b..7de7d7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3240,7 +3240,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_cfa_ntuple_filter_alloc(struct bnxt *bp,
struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic = &bp->vnic_info[fltr->rxq + 1];
bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_CFA_NTUPLE_FILTER_ALLOC, -1, -1);
- req.l2_filter_id = bp->vnic_info[0].fw_l2_filter_id[0];
+ req.l2_filter_id = bp->vnic_info[0].fw_l2_filter_id[fltr->l2_fltr_idx];
req.enables = cpu_to_le32(BNXT_NTP_FLTR_FLAGS);
@@ -6299,7 +6299,8 @@ static bool bnxt_fltr_match(struct bnxt_ntuple_filter *f1,
keys1->ports.ports == keys2->ports.ports &&
keys1->basic.ip_proto == keys2->basic.ip_proto &&
keys1->basic.n_proto == keys2->basic.n_proto &&
- ether_addr_equal(f1->src_mac_addr, f2->src_mac_addr))
+ ether_addr_equal(f1->src_mac_addr, f2->src_mac_addr) &&
+ ether_addr_equal(f1->dst_mac_addr, f2->dst_mac_addr))
return true;
return false;
@@ -6312,12 +6313,28 @@ static int bnxt_rx_flow_steer(struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb,
struct bnxt_ntuple_filter *fltr, *new_fltr;
struct flow_keys *fkeys;
struct ethhdr *eth = (struct ethhdr *)skb_mac_header(skb);
- int rc = 0, idx, bit_id;
+ int rc = 0, idx, bit_id, l2_idx = 0;
struct hlist_head *head;
if (skb->encapsulation)
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+ if (!ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, eth->h_dest)) {
+ struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic = &bp->vnic_info[0];
+ int off = 0, j;
+
+ netif_addr_lock_bh(dev);
+ for (j = 0; j < vnic->uc_filter_count; j++, off += ETH_ALEN) {
+ if (ether_addr_equal(eth->h_dest,
+ vnic->uc_list + off)) {
+ l2_idx = j + 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ netif_addr_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (!l2_idx)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
new_fltr = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_fltr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new_fltr)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6335,6 +6352,7 @@ static int bnxt_rx_flow_steer(struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb,
goto err_free;
}
+ memcpy(new_fltr->dst_mac_addr, eth->h_dest, ETH_ALEN);
memcpy(new_fltr->src_mac_addr, eth->h_source, ETH_ALEN);
idx = skb_get_hash_raw(skb) & BNXT_NTP_FLTR_HASH_MASK;
@@ -6360,6 +6378,7 @@ static int bnxt_rx_flow_steer(struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb,
new_fltr->sw_id = (u16)bit_id;
new_fltr->flow_id = flow_id;
+ new_fltr->l2_fltr_idx = l2_idx;
new_fltr->rxq = rxq_index;
hlist_add_head_rcu(&new_fltr->hash, head);
bp->ntp_fltr_count++;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
index 5307a2e..23e04a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
@@ -785,10 +785,12 @@ struct bnxt_pf_info {
struct bnxt_ntuple_filter {
struct hlist_node hash;
+ u8 dst_mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
u8 src_mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
struct flow_keys fkeys;
__le64 filter_id;
u16 sw_id;
+ u8 l2_fltr_idx;
u16 rxq;
u32 flow_id;
unsigned long state;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-25 16:33 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] bnxt_en: Improve ntuple filters and add new IDs Michael Chan
2016-07-25 16:33 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2016-07-25 16:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] bnxt_en: Log a message, if enabling NTUPLE filtering fails Michael Chan
2016-07-27 7:31 ` zhuyj
2016-07-27 8:04 ` Michael Chan
2016-07-25 16:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] bnxt_en: Add new NPAR and dual media device IDs Michael Chan
2016-07-26 4:43 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] bnxt_en: Improve ntuple filters and add new IDs David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1469464417-786-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--to=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).