From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next 0/8] xfrm: policy: convert lookups to rcu
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:17:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470921479-25592-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
Since commit d188ba86dd07a72eb ("xfrm: add rcu protection to sk->sk_policy[]")
sk_policy can rely on rcu protection.
This change allows to also use rcu in xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype and to
avoid grabbing the read-sie policy lock during lookups.
read-side policy rwlock is converted to pure rcu, then the policy_lock is
changed to a plain spinlock as only write-sides remain.
First few patches do some preparation work, the later ones remove
the read-side locks, last patch converts rwlock to spinlock.
I tested this with rcu debug enabled and simple esp tunnel
forwarding udp packets.
If you have better tests for this please let me know and I can re-run with
that.
Florian Westphal (8):
xfrm: policy: use rcu versions for iteration and list add/del
xfrm: policy: prepare policy_bydst hash for rcu lookups
xfrm: policy: add sequence count to synchronize reads with hash resizes
xfrm: policy: use atomic_inc_not_zero in rcu section
xfrm: policy: make xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype lockless
xfrm: policy: only use rcu in xfrm_sk_policy_lookup
xfrm: policy: don't acquire policy lock in xfrm_spd_getinfo
xfrm: policy: convert policy_lock to spinlock
include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 4 -
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 13:17 Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 1/8] xfrm: policy: use rcu versions for iteration and list add/del Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 2/8] xfrm: policy: prepare policy_bydst hash for rcu lookups Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 3/8] xfrm: policy: add sequence count to sync with hash resize Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 4/8] xfrm: policy: use atomic_inc_not_zero in rcu section Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 5/8] xfrm: policy: make xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype lockless Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 6/8] xfrm: policy: only use rcu in xfrm_sk_policy_lookup Florian Westphal
2016-11-16 16:43 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-11-16 17:30 ` Florian Westphal
2016-11-17 8:55 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 7/8] xfrm: policy: don't acquire policy lock in xfrm_spd_getinfo Florian Westphal
2016-08-11 13:17 ` [PATCH ipsec-next 8/8] xfrm: policy: convert policy_lock to spinlock Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 11:28 ` Steffen Klassert
2016-08-24 11:30 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-12 8:22 ` Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next 0/8] xfrm: policy: convert lookups to rcu Steffen Klassert
2016-08-22 5:15 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470921479-25592-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).