From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Timeout based on iterations
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 23:27:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471469225-368-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> (raw)
The mv88e6xxx driver times out operations on the switch based on
looping until an elapsed wall clock time is reached. However, if
usleep_range() sleeps much longer than expected, it could timeout with
an error without actually checking to see if the devices has completed
the operation. So replace the elapsed time with a fixed upper bound on
the number of loops.
Testing on various switches has shown that switches takes either 0 or
1 iteration, so a maximum of 16 iterations is a safe limit.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index a230fcba5b64..ac8e9af4879f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -309,9 +309,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_serdes_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int reg, u16 val)
static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg,
u16 mask)
{
- unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
+ int i;
- while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
u16 val;
int err;
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr,
static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
{
int ret;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ int i;
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -386,8 +386,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
if (ret)
return ret;
- timeout = jiffies + 1 * HZ;
- while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -403,8 +402,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
{
- int ret, err;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ int ret, err, i;
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -415,8 +413,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
if (err)
return err;
- timeout = jiffies + 1 * HZ;
- while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
--
2.8.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 21:27 Andrew Lunn [this message]
2016-08-17 23:08 ` [PATCH net-next] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Timeout based on iterations Vivien Didelot
2016-08-18 18:39 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471469225-368-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).