From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net_sched: act_mirred: full rcu conversion
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:23:44 -0700
Message-ID: <1473423824.18970.45.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
References: <1472795840-31901-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
         <1472795840-31901-6-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
         <1473173528.10725.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
         <57D0FF87.604@gmail.com>
         <1473341283.15733.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
         <1473348943.15733.57.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
         <57D1881B.6090009@gmail.com>
         <1473349900.15733.59.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
         <CAM_iQpV+ybrM_ebgwX5ZohmKvWZo-8znXkgJv1LhDAC9=3u9Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
        Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com>,
        Amir Vadai <amirva@mellanox.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:36677 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751441AbcIIMXr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:23:47 -0400
Received: by mail-pf0-f194.google.com with SMTP id x24so3970392pfa.3
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpV+ybrM_ebgwX5ZohmKvWZo-8znXkgJv1LhDAC9=3u9Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 22:26 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 08:47 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> >
> >> Works for me. FWIW I find this plenty straightforward and don't really
> >> see the need to make the hash table itself rcu friendly.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> >>
> >
> > Yes, it seems this hash table is used in control path, with RTNL held
> > anyway.
> 
> Seriously? You never read hashtable in fast path?? I think you need
> to wake up.

I seriously consider to ignore your mails.

Since you write patches with no changelog, expecting us to read your
mind, you definitely don't need us.