* [PATCH 1/2] openvswitch: fix flow stats accounting when node 0 is not possible
@ 2016-09-09 20:41 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-09-09 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2016-09-09 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, David Miller, Eric Dumazet
On a system with only node 1 as possible, all statistics is going to be
accounted on node 0 as it will have a single writer.
However, when getting and clearing the statistics, node 0 is not going
to be considered, as it's not a possible node.
Tested that statistics are not zero on a system with only node 1
possible. Also compile-tested with CONFIG_NUMA off.
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com>
---
I am providing this intermediate patch, that will be thrown out by the next one,
in case there is any need to backport this fix.
---
net/openvswitch/flow.c | 6 ++++--
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
index 0ea128e..3609f37 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
*tcp_flags = 0;
memset(ovs_stats, 0, sizeof(*ovs_stats));
- for_each_node(node) {
+ /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map)) {
struct flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[node]);
if (stats) {
@@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_clear(struct sw_flow *flow)
{
int node;
- for_each_node(node) {
+ /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map)) {
struct flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
if (stats) {
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index d073fff..957a3c3 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ static void flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
kfree(flow->id.unmasked_key);
if (flow->sf_acts)
ovs_nla_free_flow_actions((struct sw_flow_actions __force *)flow->sf_acts);
- for_each_node(node)
- if (flow->stats[node])
+ /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map))
+ if (node != 0 && flow->stats[node])
kmem_cache_free(flow_stats_cache,
(struct flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[node]);
kmem_cache_free(flow_cache, flow);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats
2016-09-09 20:41 [PATCH 1/2] openvswitch: fix flow stats accounting when node 0 is not possible Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
@ 2016-09-09 20:41 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-09-12 19:42 ` [ovs-dev] " pravin shelar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2016-09-09 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: netdev, Eric Dumazet, David Miller
Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.
On a E5-2690 12-core system, usual throughput went from ~4Mpps to
~15Mpps when forwarding between two 40GbE ports with a single flow
configured on the datapath.
This has been tested on a system with possible CPUs 0-7,16-23. After
module removal, there were no corruption on the slab cache.
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com>
---
net/openvswitch/flow.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
net/openvswitch/flow.h | 4 ++--
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
index 3609f37..2970a9f 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/if_arp.h>
#include <linux/ip.h>
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
@@ -72,32 +73,33 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
{
struct flow_stats *stats;
int node = numa_node_id();
+ int cpu = get_cpu();
int len = skb->len + (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0);
- stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
+ stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
- /* Check if already have node-specific stats. */
+ /* Check if already have CPU-specific stats. */
if (likely(stats)) {
spin_lock(&stats->lock);
/* Mark if we write on the pre-allocated stats. */
- if (node == 0 && unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != node))
- flow->stats_last_writer = node;
+ if (cpu == 0 && unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != cpu))
+ flow->stats_last_writer = cpu;
} else {
stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[0]); /* Pre-allocated. */
spin_lock(&stats->lock);
- /* If the current NUMA-node is the only writer on the
+ /* If the current CPU is the only writer on the
* pre-allocated stats keep using them.
*/
- if (unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != node)) {
+ if (unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != cpu)) {
/* A previous locker may have already allocated the
- * stats, so we need to check again. If node-specific
+ * stats, so we need to check again. If CPU-specific
* stats were already allocated, we update the pre-
* allocated stats as we have already locked them.
*/
- if (likely(flow->stats_last_writer != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- && likely(!rcu_access_pointer(flow->stats[node]))) {
- /* Try to allocate node-specific stats. */
+ if (likely(flow->stats_last_writer != -1) &&
+ likely(!rcu_access_pointer(flow->stats[cpu]))) {
+ /* Try to allocate CPU-specific stats. */
struct flow_stats *new_stats;
new_stats =
@@ -114,12 +116,12 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
new_stats->tcp_flags = tcp_flags;
spin_lock_init(&new_stats->lock);
- rcu_assign_pointer(flow->stats[node],
+ rcu_assign_pointer(flow->stats[cpu],
new_stats);
goto unlock;
}
}
- flow->stats_last_writer = node;
+ flow->stats_last_writer = cpu;
}
}
@@ -129,6 +131,7 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
stats->tcp_flags |= tcp_flags;
unlock:
spin_unlock(&stats->lock);
+ put_cpu();
}
/* Must be called with rcu_read_lock or ovs_mutex. */
@@ -136,15 +139,15 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
struct ovs_flow_stats *ovs_stats,
unsigned long *used, __be16 *tcp_flags)
{
- int node;
+ int cpu;
*used = 0;
*tcp_flags = 0;
memset(ovs_stats, 0, sizeof(*ovs_stats));
- /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
- for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map)) {
- struct flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[node]);
+ /* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask)) {
+ struct flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[cpu]);
if (stats) {
/* Local CPU may write on non-local stats, so we must
@@ -164,11 +167,11 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
/* Called with ovs_mutex. */
void ovs_flow_stats_clear(struct sw_flow *flow)
{
- int node;
+ int cpu;
- /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
- for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map)) {
- struct flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
+ /* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask)) {
+ struct flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
if (stats) {
spin_lock_bh(&stats->lock);
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.h b/net/openvswitch/flow.h
index 03378e7..7725ffc 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.h
@@ -172,14 +172,14 @@ struct sw_flow {
struct hlist_node node[2];
u32 hash;
} flow_table, ufid_table;
- int stats_last_writer; /* NUMA-node id of the last writer on
+ int stats_last_writer; /* CPU id of the last writer on
* 'stats[0]'.
*/
struct sw_flow_key key;
struct sw_flow_id id;
struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
struct sw_flow_actions __rcu *sf_acts;
- struct flow_stats __rcu *stats[]; /* One for each NUMA node. First one
+ struct flow_stats __rcu *stats[]; /* One for each CPU. First one
* is allocated at flow creation time,
* the rest are allocated on demand
* while holding the 'stats[0].lock'.
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 957a3c3..60e5ae0 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/if_arp.h>
#include <linux/ip.h>
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
{
struct sw_flow *flow;
struct flow_stats *stats;
- int node;
+ int cpu;
flow = kmem_cache_alloc(flow_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!flow)
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
flow->mask = NULL;
flow->id.unmasked_key = NULL;
flow->id.ufid_len = 0;
- flow->stats_last_writer = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ flow->stats_last_writer = -1;
/* Initialize the default stat node. */
stats = kmem_cache_alloc_node(flow_stats_cache,
@@ -102,9 +103,9 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[0], stats);
- for_each_node(node)
- if (node != 0)
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[node], NULL);
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ if (cpu != 0)
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[cpu], NULL);
return flow;
err:
@@ -142,17 +143,17 @@ static struct flex_array *alloc_buckets(unsigned int n_buckets)
static void flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
{
- int node;
+ int cpu;
if (ovs_identifier_is_key(&flow->id))
kfree(flow->id.unmasked_key);
if (flow->sf_acts)
ovs_nla_free_flow_actions((struct sw_flow_actions __force *)flow->sf_acts);
- /* We open code this to make sure node 0 is always considered */
- for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node = next_node(node, node_possible_map))
- if (node != 0 && flow->stats[node])
+ /* We open code this to make sure cpu 0 is always considered */
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask))
+ if (flow->stats[cpu])
kmem_cache_free(flow_stats_cache,
- (struct flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[node]);
+ (struct flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[cpu]);
kmem_cache_free(flow_cache, flow);
}
@@ -757,7 +758,7 @@ int ovs_flow_init(void)
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct sw_flow_key) % sizeof(long));
flow_cache = kmem_cache_create("sw_flow", sizeof(struct sw_flow)
- + (nr_node_ids
+ + (nr_cpu_ids
* sizeof(struct flow_stats *)),
0, 0, NULL);
if (flow_cache == NULL)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats
2016-09-09 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
@ 2016-09-12 19:42 ` pravin shelar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pravin shelar @ 2016-09-12 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Cc: ovs dev, Linux Kernel Network Developers, David Miller,
Eric Dumazet
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
<cascardo@redhat.com> wrote:
> Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
> megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.
>
> On a E5-2690 12-core system, usual throughput went from ~4Mpps to
> ~15Mpps when forwarding between two 40GbE ports with a single flow
> configured on the datapath.
>
> This has been tested on a system with possible CPUs 0-7,16-23. After
> module removal, there were no corruption on the slab cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/openvswitch/flow.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> net/openvswitch/flow.h | 4 ++--
> net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> index 3609f37..2970a9f 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/in.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/if_arp.h>
> #include <linux/ip.h>
> #include <linux/ipv6.h>
> @@ -72,32 +73,33 @@ void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
> {
> struct flow_stats *stats;
> int node = numa_node_id();
> + int cpu = get_cpu();
> int len = skb->len + (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0);
>
This function is always called from BH context. So calling
smp_processor_id() for cpu id is fine. There is no need to handle
pre-emption here.
> - stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
> + stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
>
...
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> index 957a3c3..60e5ae0 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
...
> @@ -102,9 +103,9 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
>
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[0], stats);
>
> - for_each_node(node)
> - if (node != 0)
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[node], NULL);
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + if (cpu != 0)
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[cpu], NULL);
>
I think at this point we should just use GFP_ZERO flag for allocating
struct flow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-12 19:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-09 20:41 [PATCH 1/2] openvswitch: fix flow stats accounting when node 0 is not possible Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-09-09 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-09-12 19:42 ` [ovs-dev] " pravin shelar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).