From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@openvz.org,
john.stultz@linaro.org, aduyck@mirantis.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
decot@googlers.com, fw@strlen.de, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, tom@herbertland.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org,
stephen@networkplumber.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC V3 PATCH 15/26] net/netpolicy: implement netpolicy register
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 07:55:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473692159-4017-16-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473692159-4017-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
The socket/task can only be benefited when it register itself with
specific policy. If it's the first time to register, a record will be
created and inserted into RCU hash table. The record includes ptr,
policy and object information. ptr is the socket/task's pointer which is
used as key to search the record in hash table. Object will be assigned
later.
This patch also introduces a new type NET_POLICY_INVALID, which
indicates that the task/socket are not registered.
np_hashtable_lock is introduced to protect the hash table.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
include/linux/netpolicy.h | 26 ++++++++
net/core/netpolicy.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netpolicy.h b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
index d6ba9f6..ee33978 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#define __LINUX_NETPOLICY_H
enum netpolicy_name {
+ NET_POLICY_INVALID = -1,
NET_POLICY_NONE = 0,
NET_POLICY_CPU,
NET_POLICY_BULK,
@@ -80,12 +81,37 @@ struct netpolicy_info {
struct list_head obj_list[NETPOLICY_RXTX][NET_POLICY_MAX];
};
+struct netpolicy_instance {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+ enum netpolicy_name policy; /* required policy */
+ void *ptr; /* pointers */
+};
+
+/* check if policy is valid */
+static inline int is_net_policy_valid(enum netpolicy_name policy)
+{
+ return ((policy < NET_POLICY_MAX) && (policy > NET_POLICY_INVALID));
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLICY
extern void update_netpolicy_sys_map(void);
+extern int netpolicy_register(struct netpolicy_instance *instance,
+ enum netpolicy_name policy);
+extern void netpolicy_unregister(struct netpolicy_instance *instance);
#else
static inline void update_netpolicy_sys_map(void)
{
}
+
+static inline int netpolicy_register(struct netpolicy_instance *instance,
+ enum netpolicy_name policy)
+{ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void netpolicy_unregister(struct netpolicy_instance *instance)
+{
+}
+
#endif
#endif /*__LINUX_NETPOLICY_H*/
diff --git a/net/core/netpolicy.c b/net/core/netpolicy.c
index a739ac7..503ebd1 100644
--- a/net/core/netpolicy.c
+++ b/net/core/netpolicy.c
@@ -39,6 +39,19 @@
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/hashtable.h>
+
+struct netpolicy_record {
+ struct hlist_node hash_node;
+ unsigned long ptr_id;
+ enum netpolicy_name policy;
+ struct net_device *dev;
+ struct netpolicy_object *rx_obj;
+ struct netpolicy_object *tx_obj;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(np_record_hash, 10);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(np_hashtable_lock);
static int netpolicy_get_dev_info(struct net_device *dev,
struct netpolicy_dev_info *d_info)
@@ -226,6 +239,143 @@ static int netpolicy_enable(struct net_device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static struct netpolicy_record *netpolicy_record_search(unsigned long ptr_id)
+{
+ struct netpolicy_record *rec = NULL;
+
+ hash_for_each_possible_rcu(np_record_hash, rec, hash_node, ptr_id) {
+ if (rec->ptr_id == ptr_id)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return rec;
+}
+
+static void put_queue(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netpolicy_object *rx_obj,
+ struct netpolicy_object *tx_obj)
+{
+ if (!dev || !dev->netpolicy)
+ return;
+
+ if (rx_obj)
+ atomic_dec(&rx_obj->refcnt);
+ if (tx_obj)
+ atomic_dec(&tx_obj->refcnt);
+}
+
+static void netpolicy_record_clear_obj(void)
+{
+ struct netpolicy_record *rec;
+ int i;
+
+ spin_lock(&np_hashtable_lock);
+ hash_for_each_rcu(np_record_hash, i, rec, hash_node) {
+ put_queue(rec->dev, rec->rx_obj, rec->tx_obj);
+ rec->rx_obj = NULL;
+ rec->tx_obj = NULL;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&np_hashtable_lock);
+}
+
+static void netpolicy_record_clear_dev_node(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct netpolicy_record *rec;
+ int i;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+ hash_for_each_rcu(np_record_hash, i, rec, hash_node) {
+ if (rec->dev == dev) {
+ hash_del_rcu(&rec->hash_node);
+ kfree(rec);
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * netpolicy_register() - Register per socket/task policy request
+ * @instance: NET policy per socket/task instance info
+ * @policy: request NET policy
+ *
+ * This function intends to register per socket/task policy request.
+ * If it's the first time to register, an record will be created and
+ * inserted into RCU hash table.
+ *
+ * The record includes ptr, policy and object info. ptr of the socket/task
+ * is the key to search the record in hash table. Object will be assigned
+ * until the first packet is received/transmitted.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, others on failure
+ */
+int netpolicy_register(struct netpolicy_instance *instance,
+ enum netpolicy_name policy)
+{
+ unsigned long ptr_id = (uintptr_t)instance->ptr;
+ struct netpolicy_record *new, *old;
+
+ if (!is_net_policy_valid(policy)) {
+ instance->policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new) {
+ instance->policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+ /* Check it in mapping table */
+ old = netpolicy_record_search(ptr_id);
+ if (old) {
+ if (old->policy != policy) {
+ put_queue(old->dev, old->rx_obj, old->tx_obj);
+ old->rx_obj = NULL;
+ old->tx_obj = NULL;
+ old->policy = policy;
+ }
+ kfree(new);
+ } else {
+ new->ptr_id = ptr_id;
+ new->dev = instance->dev;
+ new->policy = policy;
+ hash_add_rcu(np_record_hash, &new->hash_node, ptr_id);
+ }
+ instance->policy = policy;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpolicy_register);
+
+/**
+ * netpolicy_unregister() - Unregister per socket/task policy request
+ * @instance: NET policy per socket/task instance info
+ *
+ * This function intends to unregister policy request by del related record
+ * from hash table.
+ *
+ */
+void netpolicy_unregister(struct netpolicy_instance *instance)
+{
+ struct netpolicy_record *record;
+ unsigned long ptr_id = (uintptr_t)instance->ptr;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+ /* del from hash table */
+ record = netpolicy_record_search(ptr_id);
+ if (record) {
+ hash_del_rcu(&record->hash_node);
+ /* The record cannot be share. It can be safely free. */
+ put_queue(record->dev, record->rx_obj, record->tx_obj);
+ kfree(record);
+ }
+ instance->policy = NET_POLICY_INVALID;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&np_hashtable_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpolicy_unregister);
+
const char *policy_name[NET_POLICY_MAX] = {
"NONE",
"CPU",
@@ -833,6 +983,7 @@ static int netpolicy_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
break;
case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN:
uninit_netpolicy(dev);
+ netpolicy_record_clear_dev_node(dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
proc_remove(dev->proc_dev);
dev->proc_dev = NULL;
@@ -871,6 +1022,8 @@ void update_netpolicy_sys_map(void)
dev->netpolicy->cur_policy = NET_POLICY_NONE;
+ /* clear mapping table */
+ netpolicy_record_clear_obj();
/* rebuild everything */
netpolicy_disable(dev);
netpolicy_enable(dev);
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-12 14:55 [RFC V3 PATCH 00/26] Kernel NET policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 01/26] net: introduce " kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 02/26] net/netpolicy: init " kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 03/26] net/netpolicy: get device queue irq information kan.liang
2016-09-12 16:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-09-13 12:23 ` Liang, Kan
2016-09-13 13:14 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-13 13:22 ` Liang, Kan
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 04/26] net/netpolicy: get CPU information kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 05/26] net/netpolicy: create CPU and queue mapping kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 06/26] net/netpolicy: set and remove IRQ affinity kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 07/26] net/netpolicy: enable and disable NET policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 08/26] net/netpolicy: introduce NET policy object kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 09/26] net/netpolicy: set NET policy by policy name kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 10/26] net/netpolicy: add three new NET policies kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 11/26] net/netpolicy: add MIX policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 12/26] net/netpolicy: NET device hotplug kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 13/26] net/netpolicy: support CPU hotplug kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 14/26] net/netpolicy: handle channel changes kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` kan.liang [this message]
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 16/26] net/netpolicy: introduce per socket netpolicy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 17/26] net/netpolicy: introduce netpolicy_pick_queue kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 18/26] net/netpolicy: set tx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 20:23 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-13 12:22 ` Liang, Kan
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 19/26] net/netpolicy: tc bpf extension to pick Tx queue kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 20/26] net/netpolicy: set Rx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 21/26] net/netpolicy: introduce per task net policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 22/26] net/netpolicy: set per task policy by proc kan.liang
2016-09-12 17:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 23/26] net/netpolicy: fast path for finding the queues kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 24/26] net/netpolicy: optimize for queue pair kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 25/26] net/netpolicy: limit the total record number kan.liang
2016-09-12 14:55 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 26/26] Documentation/networking: Document NET policy kan.liang
2016-09-12 15:38 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 00/26] Kernel " Florian Westphal
2016-09-12 17:21 ` Cong Wang
2016-09-12 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-19 20:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473692159-4017-16-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@googlers.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).