public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
To: <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <john@phrozen.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <nbd@openwrt.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <nelsonch.tw@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add ethtool functions to configure RX flows of HW LRO
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:22:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473830559.25065.10.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)

(resend)

Thanks Florian for the review!
I will add ndo_fix_features hook in v2 to prevent the case that a user
wants to turn off NETIF_F_LRO but RX flow is programmed.
If any programmed RX flow exists, NETIF_F_LRO cannot be turned off.

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.fainelli@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:27 AM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); john@phrozen.org; davem@davemloft.net
Cc: nbd@openwrt.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; nelsonch.tw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add ethtool
functions to configure RX flows of HW LRO

On 09/13/2016 06:54 AM, Nelson Chang wrote:
> The codes add ethtool functions to set RX flows for HW LRO. Because 
> the HW LRO hardware can only recognize the destination IP of TCP/IP
RX 
> flows, the ethtool command to add HW LRO flow is as below:
> ethtool -N [devname] flow-type tcp4 dst-ip [ip_addr] loc [0~1]
> 
> Otherwise, cause the hardware can set total four destination IPs,
each 
> GMAC (GMAC1/GMAC2) can set two IPs separately at most.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
> ---

> +
> +static int mtk_set_features(struct net_device *dev, netdev_features_t
> +features) {
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (!((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!(features & NETIF_F_LRO))
> +		mtk_hwlro_netdev_disable(dev);

you may want to implement a fix_features ndo operations which makes sure
that NETIF_F_LRO is turned on in case a RX flow is programmed,
otherwise, it may be confusing to the user that a flow was programmed,
but no offload is happening.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-14  5:22 Nelson Chang [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-13 13:54 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add HW LRO functions Nelson Chang
2016-09-13 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: add ethtool functions to configure RX flows of HW LRO Nelson Chang
2016-09-13 18:26   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473830559.25065.10.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=nelson.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=nelsonch.tw@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox