netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [RFC 1/3] xfrm: state: do not acquire lock in get_mtu helpers
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:05:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474992323-11327-2-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474992323-11327-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>

Once flow cache is removed the mtu initialisation happens for every skb
that gets an xfrm attached to it.

It is not obvious why this lock is required -- the caller holds
reference on the state struct.

xfrm_init_state already has been called (else private data accessed
by type->get_mtu() would not be set up).

So just remove the lock -- the race on the state (DEAD?) doesn't
matter (could change right after dropping the lock too).

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index f9a255457a1d..bf5969aa7dc2 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2008,16 +2008,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_delete_tunnel);
 
 int xfrm_state_mtu(struct xfrm_state *x, int mtu)
 {
-	int res;
+	const struct xfrm_type *type = READ_ONCE(x->type);
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
 	if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID &&
-	    x->type && x->type->get_mtu)
-		res = x->type->get_mtu(x, mtu);
-	else
-		res = mtu - x->props.header_len;
-	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
-	return res;
+	    type && type->get_mtu)
+		return type->get_mtu(x, mtu);
+
+	return mtu - x->props.header_len;
 }
 
 int __xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x, bool init_replay)
-- 
2.7.3

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-27 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-27 16:05 [RFC 0/3] ipsec: flow cache removal Florian Westphal
2016-09-27 16:05 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-09-27 16:05 ` [RFC 2/3] vti: revert flush x-netns xfrm cache when vti interface is removed Florian Westphal
2016-09-27 16:05 ` [RFC 3/3] xfrm: remove flow cache Florian Westphal
2016-09-28  2:15 ` [RFC 0/3] ipsec: flow cache removal David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1474992323-11327-2-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).