From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:28:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475206144-23228-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com> (raw)
In a PowerPc server with large cpu number(160), besides commit
a3a773726c9f ("net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by walking all
the percpu data at once"), I watched several other snmp_fold_field
callsites which would cause high cache miss rate.
test source code:
================
My simple test case, which read from the procfs items endlessly:
/***********************************************************/
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#define LINELEN 2560
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i;
int fd = -1 ;
int rdsize = 0;
char buf[LINELEN+1];
buf[LINELEN] = 0;
memset(buf,0,LINELEN);
if(1 >= argc) {
printf("file name empty\n");
return -1;
}
fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR, 0644);
if(0 > fd){
printf("open error\n");
return -2;
}
for(i=0;i<0xffffffff;i++) {
while(0 < (rdsize = read(fd,buf,LINELEN))){
//nothing here
}
lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
}
close(fd);
return 0;
}
/**********************************************************/
compile and run:
================
gcc test.c -o test
perf stat -d -e cache-misses ./test /proc/net/snmp
perf stat -d -e cache-misses ./test /proc/net/snmp6
perf stat -d -e cache-misses ./test /proc/net/sctp/snmp
perf stat -d -e cache-misses ./test /proc/net/xfrm_stat
before the patch set:
====================
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
355911097 cache-misses [40.08%]
2356829300 L1-dcache-loads [60.04%]
355642645 L1-dcache-load-misses # 15.09% of all L1-dcache hits [60.02%]
346544541 LLC-loads [59.97%]
389763 LLC-load-misses # 0.11% of all LL-cache hits [40.02%]
6.245162638 seconds time elapsed
After the patch set:
===================
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
194992476 cache-misses [40.03%]
6718051877 L1-dcache-loads [60.07%]
194871921 L1-dcache-load-misses # 2.90% of all L1-dcache hits [60.11%]
187632232 LLC-loads [60.04%]
464466 LLC-load-misses # 0.25% of all LL-cache hits [39.89%]
6.868422769 seconds time elapsed
The cache-miss rate can be reduced from 15% to 2.9%
changelog
=========
v6:
- correct v5
v5:
- order local variables from longest to shortest line
v4:
- move memset into one block of if statement in snmp6_seq_show_item
- remove the changes in netstat_seq_show considerred the stack usage is too large
v3:
- introduce generic interface (suggested by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner)
- use max_t instead of self defined macro (suggested by David Miller)
v2:
- fix bug in udplite statistics.
- snmp_seq_show is split into 2 parts
Jia He (7):
net:snmp: Introduce generic interfaces for snmp_get_cpu_field{,64}
proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp_seq_show
proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show
proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show
proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show
ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev
net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warnings
include/net/ip.h | 23 ++++++++++++
net/ipv4/proc.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 12 +++---
net/ipv6/proc.c | 30 +++++++++++----
net/sctp/proc.c | 10 +++--
net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c | 10 ++++-
6 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-30 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-30 3:28 Jia He [this message]
2016-09-30 3:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] net:snmp: Introduce generic interfaces for snmp_get_cpu_field{,64} Jia He
2016-09-30 3:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-30 3:29 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-30 3:29 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-30 3:29 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-30 3:29 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev Jia He
2016-09-30 3:29 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warnings Jia He
2016-09-30 6:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475206144-23228-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com \
--to=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).