netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: check the hw lro capability by the chip id instead of the dtsi
@ 2016-10-05 12:12 Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers Nelson Chang
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw, Nelson Chang

The series modify to check if hw lro is supported by the chip id.

changes since v2:
- Refine mtk_get_chip_id() function

changes since v1:
- Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to check if the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of by the dtsi.

Nelson Chang (3):
  net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers
  net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead
    of by the dtsi
  net: ethernet: mediatek: remove hwlro property in the device tree

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt       |  2 --
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c        | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h        |  6 ++++
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers
  2016-10-05 12:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: check the hw lro capability by the chip id instead of the dtsi Nelson Chang
@ 2016-10-05 12:12 ` Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: remove hwlro property in the device tree Nelson Chang
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw, Nelson Chang

The driver gets the chip id by ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3/ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7 registers
in mtk_probe().

Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
index ad4ab97..0c67ab1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -2323,6 +2323,31 @@ free_netdev:
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 *chip_id)
+{
+	u32 val[2], id[4];
+
+	regmap_read(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3, &val[0]);
+	regmap_read(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7, &val[1]);
+
+	id[3] = ((val[0] >> 16) & 0xff) - '0';
+	id[2] = ((val[0] >> 24) & 0xff) - '0';
+	id[1] = (val[1] & 0xff) - '0';
+	id[0] = ((val[1] >> 8) & 0xff) - '0';
+
+	*chip_id = (id[3] * 1000) + (id[2] * 100) +
+		   (id[1] * 10) + id[0];
+
+	if (!(*chip_id)) {
+		dev_err(eth->dev, "failed to get chip id\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(eth->dev, "chip id = %d\n", *chip_id);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -2388,6 +2413,10 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	err = mtk_get_chip_id(eth, &eth->chip_id);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, mac_np) {
 		if (!of_device_is_compatible(mac_np,
 					     "mediatek,eth-mac"))
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
index 3003195..a5b422b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
@@ -342,6 +342,10 @@
 #define GPIO_BIAS_CTRL		0xed0
 #define GPIO_DRV_SEL10		0xf00
 
+/* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
+#define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3	0x0
+#define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7	0x4
+
 /* ethernet subsystem config register */
 #define ETHSYS_SYSCFG0		0x14
 #define SYSCFG0_GE_MASK		0x3
@@ -534,6 +538,7 @@ struct mtk_eth {
 	unsigned long			sysclk;
 	struct regmap			*ethsys;
 	struct regmap			*pctl;
+	u32				chip_id;
 	bool				hwlro;
 	atomic_t			dma_refcnt;
 	struct mtk_tx_ring		tx_ring;
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
  2016-10-05 12:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: check the hw lro capability by the chip id instead of the dtsi Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers Nelson Chang
@ 2016-10-05 12:12 ` Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:18   ` Sergei Shtylyov
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: remove hwlro property in the device tree Nelson Chang
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw, Nelson Chang

Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to check if
the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of by the dtsi.

Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
index 0c67ab1..07f3ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -2348,6 +2348,14 @@ static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 *chip_id)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth)
+{
+	if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
+		return true;
+	else
+		return false;
+}
+
 static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -2387,8 +2395,6 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(eth->pctl);
 	}
 
-	eth->hwlro = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,hwlro");
-
 	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
 		eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
 		if (eth->irq[i] < 0) {
@@ -2417,6 +2423,8 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	eth->hwlro = mtk_is_hwlro_supported(eth);
+
 	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, mac_np) {
 		if (!of_device_is_compatible(mac_np,
 					     "mediatek,eth-mac"))
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
index a5b422b..58738fd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
@@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
 /* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
 #define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3	0x0
 #define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7	0x4
+#define MT7623_ETH		(7623)
 
 /* ethernet subsystem config register */
 #define ETHSYS_SYSCFG0		0x14
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: remove hwlro property in the device tree
  2016-10-05 12:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: check the hw lro capability by the chip id instead of the dtsi Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi Nelson Chang
@ 2016-10-05 12:12 ` Nelson Chang
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw, Nelson Chang

Since the proper way to check the hw lro capability is by the chip id,
hwlro property in the device tree should be removed.

Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
index f095257..c010faf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/mediatek-net.txt
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ Required properties:
 Optional properties:
 - interrupt-parent: Should be the phandle for the interrupt controller
   that services interrupts for this device
-- mediatek,hwlro: the capability if the hardware supports LRO functions
 
 * Ethernet MAC node
 
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ eth: ethernet@1b100000 {
 	reset-names = "eth";
 	mediatek,ethsys = <&ethsys>;
 	mediatek,pctl = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-	mediatek,hwlro;
 	#address-cells = <1>;
 	#size-cells = <0>;
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
  2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi Nelson Chang
@ 2016-10-05 12:18   ` Sergei Shtylyov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2016-10-05 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nelson Chang, john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw

Hello.

On 10/05/2016 03:12 PM, Nelson Chang wrote:

> Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to check if
> the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of by the dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index 0c67ab1..07f3ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,14 @@ static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth, u32 *chip_id)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth)
> +{
> +	if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> +		return true;
> +	else
> +		return false;

	return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;

[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> index a5b422b..58738fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
>  /* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3	0x0
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7	0x4
> +#define MT7623_ETH		(7623)

    () not needed at all.

MBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
@ 2016-10-05 12:38 Nelson Chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sergei.shtylyov, john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw

Hi Sergei,

Thanks for your comments.
Modified.


Nelson

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 8:18 PM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); john@phrozen.org; davem@davemloft.net
Cc: nbd@openwrt.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; nelsonch.tw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro
capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi

Hello.

On 10/05/2016 03:12 PM, Nelson Chang wrote:

> Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to 
> check if the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of
by the dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++++--  
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index 0c67ab1..07f3ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,14 @@ static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth,
u32 *chip_id)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> +	if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> +		return true;
> +	else
> +		return false;

	return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;

[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> index a5b422b..58738fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
>  /* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3	0x0
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7	0x4
> +#define MT7623_ETH		(7623)

    () not needed at all.

MBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
@ 2016-10-05 12:46 Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
  2016-10-05 13:07 ` David Laight
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sergei.shtylyov, john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw

Hi Sergei,

Sorry, miss that.

> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> +             return true;
> +     else
> +             return false;

        return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;

=> Since there will be more chips support hw lro in the future, keep the
original codes to have the scalability like this:
if (eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
    eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH ||
    ....)
	return true;



Nelson

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 8:18 PM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); john@phrozen.org; davem@davemloft.net
Cc: nbd@openwrt.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; nelsonch.tw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro
capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi

Hello.

On 10/05/2016 03:12 PM, Nelson Chang wrote:

> Because hw lro started to be supported from MT7623, the proper way to
> check if the feature is capable is to judge by the chip id instead of
by the dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Chang <nelson.chang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index 0c67ab1..07f3ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,14 @@ static int mtk_get_chip_id(struct mtk_eth *eth,
u32 *chip_id)
>       return 0;
>  }
>
> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> +             return true;
> +     else
> +             return false;

        return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;

[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> index a5b422b..58738fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@
>  /* ethernet subsystem chip id register */
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID0_3     0x0
>  #define ETHSYS_CHIPID4_7     0x4
> +#define MT7623_ETH           (7623)

    () not needed at all.

MBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
  2016-10-05 12:46 Nelson Chang
@ 2016-10-05 12:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
  2016-10-05 13:07 ` David Laight
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2016-10-05 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nelson Chang, john, davem; +Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw

On 10/05/2016 03:46 PM, Nelson Chang wrote:

>> +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
>> +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
>> +             return true;
>> +     else
>> +             return false;
>
>         return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;
>
> => Since there will be more chips support hw lro in the future, keep the
> original codes to have the scalability like this:
> if (eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
>     eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH ||
>     ....)
> 	return true;

    Then use *switch*, not *if*.

> Nelson

MBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
  2016-10-05 12:46 Nelson Chang
  2016-10-05 12:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2016-10-05 13:07 ` David Laight
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2016-10-05 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Nelson Chang', sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
	john@phrozen.org, davem@davemloft.net
  Cc: nbd@openwrt.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, nelsonch.tw@gmail.com

From: Nelson Chang
> Sent: 05 October 2016 13:46
> > +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> > +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> > +             return true;
> > +     else
> > +             return false;
> 
>         return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;
> 
> => Since there will be more chips support hw lro in the future, keep the
> original codes to have the scalability like this:
> if (eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
>     eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH ||
>     ....)
> 	return true;

Nothing wrong with:

	return eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
		eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH;

	David


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi
@ 2016-10-05 13:21 Nelson Chang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nelson Chang @ 2016-10-05 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David.Laight, sergei.shtylyov, john, davem
  Cc: nbd, netdev, linux-mediatek, nelsonch.tw

Hi Sergei, David,

I think modifying that as below is clear and scalable. Agree?

static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth)
{
	switch (eth->chip_id) {
	case MT7623_ETH:
		return true;
	}

	return false;
}

Thanks.


Nelson
-----Original Message-----
From: David Laight [mailto:David.Laight@ACULAB.COM] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:07 PM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com;
john@phrozen.org; davem@davemloft.net
Cc: nbd@openwrt.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; nelsonch.tw@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro
capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi

From: Nelson Chang
> Sent: 05 October 2016 13:46
> > +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> > +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> > +             return true;
> > +     else
> > +             return false;
> 
>         return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;
> 
> => Since there will be more chips support hw lro in the future, keep 
> the original codes to have the scalability like this:
> if (eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
>     eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH ||
>     ....)
> 	return true;

Nothing wrong with:

	return eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
		eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH;

	David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-05 13:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-05 12:12 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: check the hw lro capability by the chip id instead of the dtsi Nelson Chang
2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get the chip id by ETHDMASYS registers Nelson Chang
2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi Nelson Chang
2016-10-05 12:18   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-10-05 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: remove hwlro property in the device tree Nelson Chang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-05 12:38 [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi Nelson Chang
2016-10-05 12:46 Nelson Chang
2016-10-05 12:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-10-05 13:07 ` David Laight
2016-10-05 13:21 Nelson Chang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).