From: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
To: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Oren Givon <oren.givon@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: pcie: reduce "unsupported splx" to a warning
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:25:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476253524.7776.8.camel@coelho.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEUsAPYDPCP0NBaTmy4xqFJhAS4xFQYinoNTknxFT23ef0dk4w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > > This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
> > > tables. Can you tell us which platform you are using?
>
>
> Interesting. I'm running a Dell XPS 13 9350. I replaced the
> factory-provided Broadcom card with an AC 8260. I can update the
> commit log to reflect this.
Okay, so this makes sense. Those entries are probably formatted for
the Broadcom card, which the iwlwifi driver obviously doesn't
understand. The best we can do, as I already said, is to ignore values
we don't understand.
I will also check what is the correct procedure in such cases, because
it is possible, in theory, that the format *matches* but applies only
to another device.
> > > If this is really bothering you, I guess I could apply this patch for
> > > now. But as I said, this is not solving the actual problem.
> >
> >
> > Bikeshedding: I think IWL_INFO() is more appropriate, as info doesn't
> > imply one needs to act on this message, while warn does imply that
> > action is needed.
>
>
> Agreed. I still think making this a warning is appropriate, but it
> seems pretty clear this is not an error. This has nothing to do with
> how much it bothers me. An error tells the user something needs to be
> fixed, but in this case the interface is working fine. Making it a
> warning with an improved message will result in fewer people wasting
> their time.
Yes, so I'll try to stop wasting people's timing by trying to do the
correct thing without bothering the user at all. :)
Thanks for pointing this all out!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 7:19 [PATCH] iwlwifi: pcie: reduce "unsupported splx" to a warning Chris Rorvick
2016-10-10 14:02 ` Luca Coelho
[not found] ` <1476108164.5210.11.camel-XPOmlcxoEMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-11 10:11 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-11 14:09 ` Chris Rorvick
2016-10-11 14:27 ` Chris Rorvick
2016-10-12 6:25 ` Luca Coelho [this message]
2016-10-12 4:32 ` Chris Rorvick
2016-10-12 12:24 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-12 12:36 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-12 13:06 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-12 6:11 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-12 6:52 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-12 17:50 ` Chris Rorvick
[not found] ` <CAEUsAPYYJ3Gmh0T16veCn3wnzdD8bTxE+_U-AUYQpMo3TUd4Mg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-12 18:05 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-12 18:36 ` Chris Rorvick
2016-10-13 9:01 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-13 10:21 ` [PATCH] iwlwifi: pcie: fix SPLC structure parsing Luca Coelho
2016-10-13 11:27 ` Paul Bolle
[not found] ` <1476358075.1999.5.camel-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-13 11:30 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-13 12:36 ` Paul Bolle
[not found] ` <1476362194.1999.11.camel-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-13 12:44 ` Luca Coelho
[not found] ` <1476362653.3880.25.camel-XPOmlcxoEMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-13 12:55 ` Paul Bolle
2016-10-13 17:49 ` Luca Coelho
2016-10-13 13:56 ` Chris Rorvick
2016-10-13 14:30 ` Luca Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476253524.7776.8.camel@coelho.fi \
--to=luca@coelho.fi \
--cc=chris@rorvick.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oren.givon@intel.com \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).