netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: jiri@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, sean.hefty@intel.com,
	hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:51:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476305519-28833-3-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476305519-28833-1-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>

This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
and lower devices.

The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
the functions return that code back to callers.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |  17 +++++
 net/core/dev.c            | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 175 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 136ae6bbe81e..053f6f75f26a 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3839,6 +3839,14 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
 	     updev; \
 	     updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
 
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+					    void *data),
+				  void *data);
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  struct net_device *upper_dev);
+
 void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
 				    struct list_head **iter);
 void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3882,6 +3890,15 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
 	     ldev; \
 	     ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
 
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+			      int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+					void *data),
+			      void *data);
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+					    void *data),
+				  void *data);
+
 void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
 void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
 struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5aaa12a9e369..fcf3641db783 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5292,6 +5292,37 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
 
 /**
+ * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
+ * @dev: device
+ * @upper_dev: upper device to check
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
+ * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
+ * The caller must hold rcu lock.
+ */
+
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+	if (upper_dev == dev)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  struct net_device *upper_dev)
+{
+	if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+					  upper_dev))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
+
+/**
  * netdev_has_any_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
  * @dev: device
  *
@@ -5391,6 +5422,51 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
 
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+						    struct list_head **iter)
+{
+	struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+
+	upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+	if (&upper->list == &dev->adj_list.upper)
+		return NULL;
+
+	*iter = &upper->list;
+
+	return upper->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+					    void *data),
+				  void *data)
+{
+	struct list_head *iter;
+	struct net_device *udev;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.upper,
+	     udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+	     udev;
+	     udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+		/* first is the upper device itself */
+		ret = fn(udev, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		/* then look at all of its upper devices */
+		ret = netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(udev, fn, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu);
+
 /**
  * netdev_lower_get_next_private - Get the next ->private from the
  *				   lower neighbour list
@@ -5497,6 +5573,49 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
 
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+						struct list_head **iter)
+{
+	struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+	lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+	if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+		return NULL;
+
+	*iter = lower->list.next;
+
+	return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+			      int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+					void *data),
+			      void *data)
+{
+	struct list_head *iter;
+	struct net_device *ldev;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+	     ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter));
+	     ldev;
+	     ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter))) {
+		/* first is the lower device itself */
+		ret = fn(ldev, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		/* then look at all of its lower devices */
+		ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
+
 /**
  * netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
  *				   lower neighbour list, RCU variant
@@ -5518,6 +5637,45 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
 
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+						    struct list_head **iter)
+{
+	struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+	lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->adj_list.lower,
+				       struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+	return lower ? lower->dev : NULL;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+				  int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+					    void *data),
+				  void *data)
+{
+	struct list_head *iter;
+	struct net_device *ldev;
+	int ret;
+
+	for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+	     ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+	     ldev;
+	     ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+		/* first is the lower device itself */
+		ret = fn(ldev, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		/* then look at all of its lower devices */
+		ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(ldev, fn, data);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu);
+
 /**
  * netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
  *				       lower neighbour list, RCU
-- 
2.1.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-12 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 20:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern [this message]
2016-10-13  7:30   ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices Jiri Pirko
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] IB/core: " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] ixgbe: " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] mlxsw: " David Ahern
     [not found] ` <1476305519-28833-1-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-12 20:51   ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51   ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51   ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] rocker: Flip to the " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51   ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-14 14:17   ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev " David Miller
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: Remove all_adj_list and its references David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list David Ahern
2016-10-13  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking Jiri Pirko
     [not found]   ` <20161013073424.GB1816-6KJVSR23iU488b5SBfVpbw@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-13 14:32     ` David Ahern
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-15  1:28 [PATCH v2 " David Ahern
     [not found] ` <1476494931-31813-1-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-15  1:28   ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices David Ahern
     [not found]     ` <1476494931-31813-3-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-17 12:21       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-10-17 14:42         ` David Miller
2016-10-18  0:42         ` David Ahern
2016-10-18  2:15 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-18  2:15 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476305519-28833-3-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --to=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).