From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: aes_ccm: move struct aead_req off the stack Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:15:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1476450941.31114.45.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1476450540-1760-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1476450635.31114.42.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20161014_151311_047575_C7571920) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Sergey Senozhatsky , "" , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jouni Malinen To: Ard Biesheuvel Return-path: In-Reply-To: (sfid-20161014_151311_047575_C7571920) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 14:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >  > > But if we allocate things anyway, is it worth expending per-CPU > > buffers on these? > > Ehmm, maybe not. I could spin a v2 that allocates a bigger buffer, > and copies aad[] into it as well Copies in/out, I guess. Also there's B_0/J_0 for CCM/GCM, and the 'zero' thing that GMAC has. > That does not help the other algos though What do you mean? johannes