Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <stephen.suryaputra.lin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <ssurya@ieee.org>
Subject: [PATCH net,v2] Fixes: 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in struct rtable again.")
Date: Mon,  7 Nov 2016 17:48:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478558919-12014-1-git-send-email-ssurya@ieee.org> (raw)

ICMP redirects behavior is different after the commit above. An email
requesting the explanation on why the behavior needs to be different
was sent earlier to netdev (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/687728/).
Since there isn't a reply yet, I decided to prepare this formal patch.

In v2.6 kernel, it used to be that ip_rt_redirect() calls
arp_bind_neighbour() which returns 0 and then the state of the neigh for
the new_gw is checked. If the state isn't valid then the redirected
route is deleted. This behavior is maintained up to v3.5.7 by
check_peer_redirect() because rt->rt_gateway is assigned to
peer->redirect_learned.a4 before calling ipv4_neigh_lookup().

After the commit, ipv4_neigh_lookup() is performed without the
rt_gateway assigned to the new_gw. In the case when rt_gateway (old_gw)
isn't zero, the function uses it as the key. The neigh is most likely valid
since the old_gw is the one that sends the ICMP redirect message. Then the
new_gw is assigned to fib_nh_exception. The problem is: the new_gw ARP may
never gets resolved and the traffic is blackholed.

Changes from v1:
 - use __ipv4_neigh_lookup instead (per Eric Dumazet).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <ssurya@ieee.org>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 62d4d90c1389..2a57566e6e91 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -753,7 +753,9 @@ static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow
 			goto reject_redirect;
 	}
 
-	n = ipv4_neigh_lookup(&rt->dst, NULL, &new_gw);
+	n = __ipv4_neigh_lookup(rt->dst.dev, new_gw);
+	if (!n)
+		n = neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &new_gw, rt->dst.dev);
 	if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
 		if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
 			neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-07 22:48 Stephen Suryaputra Lin [this message]
2016-11-10  1:20 ` [PATCH net,v2] Fixes: 5943634fc559 ("ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info in struct rtable again.") David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1478558919-12014-1-git-send-email-ssurya@ieee.org \
    --to=stephen.suryaputra.lin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssurya@ieee.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox