From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: TCP port firewall controlled by UDP packets Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:25:10 -0400 Message-ID: <14788.1313177110@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <1313106969-18733-1-git-send-email-as@strmilov.cz> <20110811171317.271be88b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <4E45482B.7080207@strmilov.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1313177110_2634P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Antonin Steinhauser Return-path: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:35:07 +0200." <4E45482B.7080207@strmilov.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1313177110_2634P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:35:07 +0200, Antonin Steinhauser said: > Dne 12.8.2011 02:13, Randy Dunlap napsal(a): > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:56:09 +0200 Tonda wrote: > >> +config TCPFIREWALL > >> + tristate "TCP Firewall controlled by UDP queries" > >> + depends on m > >> > > Why buildable only as a loadable module? > > > > > Because it needs parameter - address of inet_protos table from > /boot/System_map That's probably a very good indication that you're doing it the wrong way, and need to redesign what you're doing.... --==_Exmh_1313177110_2634P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFORX4WcC3lWbTT17ARAuhFAKCDyXIT+ig4eR06XyzBXCt48dZboACePLl7 TWBfv0/q2LLg7EOYbPZ51AY= =+t5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1313177110_2634P--