netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Adam Belay <abelay@google.com>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com>,
	Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@cavium.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: busy-poll: return busypolling status to drivers
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:15:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479233715-9905-4-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479233715-9905-1-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com>

NAPI drivers use napi_complete_done() or napi_complete() when
they drained RX ring and right before re-enabling device interrupts.

In busy polling, we can avoid interrupts being delivered since
we are polling RX ring in a controlled loop.

Drivers can chose to use napi_complete_done() return value
to reduce interrupts overhead while busy polling is active.

This is optional, legacy drivers should work fine even
if not updated.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Adam Belay <abelay@google.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Cc: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com>
Cc: Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@cavium.com>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |  7 ++++---
 net/core/dev.c            | 10 ++++++----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index e71de66e3792..bcddf951ccee 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -463,16 +463,17 @@ static inline bool napi_reschedule(struct napi_struct *napi)
 	return false;
 }
 
-void __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n);
-void napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done);
+bool __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n);
+bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done);
 /**
  *	napi_complete - NAPI processing complete
  *	@n: NAPI context
  *
  * Mark NAPI processing as complete.
  * Consider using napi_complete_done() instead.
+ * Return false if device should avoid rearming interrupts.
  */
-static inline void napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
+static inline bool napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
 {
 	return napi_complete_done(n, 0);
 }
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 369dcc8efc01..edba9efeb2e9 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4898,7 +4898,7 @@ void __napi_schedule_irqoff(struct napi_struct *n)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule_irqoff);
 
-void __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
+bool __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
 {
 	BUG_ON(!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state));
 
@@ -4906,15 +4906,16 @@ void __napi_complete(struct napi_struct *n)
 	 * napi_complete_done().
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(test_bit(NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL, &n->state)))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
 	smp_mb__before_atomic();
 	clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state);
+	return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_complete);
 
-void napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
+bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -4926,7 +4927,7 @@ void napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(n->state & (NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC |
 				 NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL)))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	if (n->gro_list) {
 		unsigned long timeout = 0;
@@ -4948,6 +4949,7 @@ void napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
 		__napi_complete(n);
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
+	return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(napi_complete_done);
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-15 18:15 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: busy-poll: allow preemption and other optimizations Eric Dumazet
2016-11-15 18:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: busy-poll: allow preemption in sk_busy_loop() Eric Dumazet
2016-11-15 18:15 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: busy-poll: remove need_resched() from sk_can_busy_loop() Eric Dumazet
2016-11-15 18:15 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2016-11-15 18:15 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net/mlx4_en: use napi_complete_done() return value Eric Dumazet
2016-11-15 18:15 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] bnx2x: switch to napi_complete_done() Eric Dumazet
2016-11-16 18:03 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: busy-poll: allow preemption and other optimizations John Fastabend
2016-11-16 18:41 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1479233715-9905-4-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com \
    --cc=abelay@google.com \
    --cc=ariel.elior@cavium.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=zach.brown@ni.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).