netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH net 1/1] tipc: fix compatibility bug in link monitoring
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:05:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479953126-3552-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com> (raw)

commit 817298102b0b ("tipc: fix link priority propagation") introduced a
compatibility problem between TIPC versions newer than Linux 4.6 and
those older than Linux 4.4. In versions later than 4.4, link STATE
messages only contain a non-zero link priority value when the sender
wants the receiver to change its priority. This has the effect that the
receiver resets itself in order to apply the new priority. This works
well, and is consistent with the said commit.

However, in versions older than 4.4 a valid link priority is present in
all sent link STATE messages, leading to cyclic link establishment and
reset on the 4.6+ node.

We fix this by adding a test that the received value should not only
be valid, but also differ from the current value in order to cause the
receiving link endpoint to reset.

Reported-by: Amar Nv <amar.nv005@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
---
 net/tipc/link.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 1055164..ecc12411 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -1492,8 +1492,9 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL))
 			l->tolerance = peers_tol;
 
-		if (peers_prio && in_range(peers_prio, TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI,
-					   TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI)) {
+		/* Update own prio if peer indicates a different value */
+		if ((peers_prio != l->priority) &&
+		    in_range(peers_prio, 1, TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI)) {
 			l->priority = peers_prio;
 			rc = tipc_link_fsm_evt(l, LINK_FAILURE_EVT);
 		}
-- 
2.7.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-24  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-24  2:05 Jon Maloy [this message]
2016-11-26  1:06 ` [PATCH net 1/1] tipc: fix compatibility bug in link monitoring David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1479953126-3552-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
    --to=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).