From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: integer overflow in sctp_auth_create_key()
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:33:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147F953A-CC69-41FF-ACD4-64E5E2956411@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED3AC7D.6090108@hp.com>
I agree that this is not a security issue if key_len can never get large.
So how about just removing the overflow check at all?
- xi
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
>
> Hmm. Yes, this is a more correct check.
>
> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
>
>
> However, I don't think this is a security issue. As I've written before, this function is
> called from 2 places:
>
> 1) setsockopt() code path
>
> 2) sctp_auth_asoc_set_secret() code path
>
> In case (1), sca_keylength is never going to exceed 65535 since it's
> bounded by a u16 from the user api. As such, The integer promotion will
> not impact anything and the malloc() will never overflow.
>
> In case (2), sca_keylength is computed based on the key the user provided
> (MAX_USHORT) and the combination of protocol negotiated data where that
> combination has a max size of 3 * MAX_USHORT (see sctp_auth_make_key_vector()).
> So, even this case, our maximum key length can be 4* MAX_USHORT which still
> will always be below MAX_INT and will not overflow.
>
> So, I don't think there is big security consideration here, just a bad
> check that just happens to always work.
>
> -vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <426D7BA8-ECD0-44D6-A09F-2033F0C825FC@gmail.com>
2011-11-28 15:45 ` [PATCH] sctp: integer overflow in sctp_auth_create_key() Vladislav Yasevich
2011-11-29 7:33 ` Xi Wang [this message]
2011-11-29 15:03 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-11-29 19:24 ` Xi Wang
2011-11-29 19:26 ` [PATCH v2] sctp: better integer overflow check " Xi Wang
2011-11-29 19:35 ` David Miller
2011-11-23 1:55 [PATCH] sctp: integer overflow " Xi Wang
2011-11-29 6:19 ` David Miller
2011-11-29 19:31 ` Xi Wang
2011-11-29 19:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147F953A-CC69-41FF-ACD4-64E5E2956411@gmail.com \
--to=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).