From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net/mlx5e: Correct cleanup order when deleting offloaded TC rules
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:19:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480457972-31286-6-git-send-email-saeedm@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480457972-31286-1-git-send-email-saeedm@mellanox.com>
From: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
According to the reverse unwinding principle, on delete time we should
first handle deletion of the steering rule and later handle the vlan
deletion from the eswitch.
Fixes: 8b32580df1cb ("net/mlx5e: Add TC vlan action for SRIOV offloads")
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index dd6d954..4d71445 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -151,11 +151,11 @@ static void mlx5e_tc_del_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
counter = mlx5_flow_rule_counter(rule);
+ mlx5_del_flow_rules(rule);
+
if (esw && esw->mode == SRIOV_OFFLOADS)
mlx5_eswitch_del_vlan_action(esw, attr);
- mlx5_del_flow_rules(rule);
-
mlx5_fc_destroy(priv->mdev, counter);
if (!mlx5e_tc_num_filters(priv) && (priv->fs.tc.t)) {
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-29 22:19 [PATCH net-next 0/7] Mellanox 100G mlx5 updates 2016-11-29 Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net/mlx5e: Implement Fragmented Work Queue (WQ) Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 23:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 10:02 ` Tariq Toukan
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net/mlx5e: Move function mlx5e_create_umr_mkey Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net/mlx5e: Create UMR MKey per RQ Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net/mlx5e: Remove redundant hashtable lookup in configure flower Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 22:19 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net/mlx5e: Refactor tc del flow to accept mlx5e_tc_flow instance Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-29 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net/mlx5e: Remove flow encap entry in the correct place Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480457972-31286-6-git-send-email-saeedm@mellanox.com \
--to=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=roid@mellanox.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).