From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:53:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481017989.6225.21.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480960639.18162.556.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Hi Eric,
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:57 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> In UDP recvmsg() path we currently access 3 cache lines from an skb
> while holding receive queue lock, plus another one if packet is
> dequeued, since we need to change skb->next->prev
>
> 1st cache line (contains ->next/prev pointers, offsets 0x00 and 0x08)
> 2nd cache line (skb->len & skb->peeked, offsets 0x80 and 0x8e)
> 3rd cache line (skb->truesize/users, offsets 0xe0 and 0xe4)
>
> skb->peeked is only needed to make sure 0-length packets are properly
> handled while MSG_PEEK is operated.
>
> I had first the intent to remove skb->peeked but the "MSG_PEEK at
> non-zero offset" support added by Sam Kumar makes this not possible.
I'm wondering if peeking with offset is going to complicate the 2 queues
patch, too.
> This patch avoids one cache line miss during the locked section, when
> skb->len and skb->peeked do not have to be read.
>
> It also avoids the skb_set_peeked() cost for non empty UDP datagrams.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> net/core/datagram.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
> index 49816af8586bb832e806972b486588041a99524c..9482037a5c8c64aec79e42c65bd2691bdd9450a3 100644
> --- a/net/core/datagram.c
> +++ b/net/core/datagram.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
> if (error)
> goto no_packet;
>
> + *peeked = 0;
> do {
> /* Again only user level code calls this function, so nothing
> * interrupt level will suddenly eat the receive_queue.
> @@ -227,22 +228,22 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_try_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags,
> spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, cpu_flags);
> skb_queue_walk(queue, skb) {
> *last = skb;
> - *peeked = skb->peeked;
> if (flags & MSG_PEEK) {
> if (_off >= skb->len && (skb->len || _off ||
> skb->peeked)) {
> _off -= skb->len;
> continue;
> }
> -
> - skb = skb_set_peeked(skb);
> - error = PTR_ERR(skb);
> - if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock,
> - cpu_flags);
> - goto no_packet;
> + if (!skb->len) {
> + skb = skb_set_peeked(skb);
> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(skb);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock,
> + cpu_flags);
> + goto no_packet;
> + }
> }
I don't understand why we can avoid setting skb->peek if len > 0. I
think that will change the kernel behavior if:
- peek with offset is set
- 3 skbs with len > 0 are enqueued
- the u/s peek (with offset) the second one
- the u/s disable peeking with offset and peeks 2 more skbs.
With the current code in the last step the u/s is going to peek the 1#
and the 3# skbs, after this patch will peek the 1# and the 2#. Am I
missing something ? Probably the new behavior is more correct, but still
is a change.
I gave this a run in my test bed on top of your udp-related patches I
see additional ~3 improvement in the udp flood scenario, and a bit more
in the un-contended scenario.
Thank you,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 2:43 [RFC] udp: some improvements on RX path Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 13:22 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-05 14:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 15:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-05 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 17:57 ` [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 9:53 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2016-12-06 12:10 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 14:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 10:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 17:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 18:31 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 18:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 19:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 19:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 3:32 ` [PATCH net-next] net: sock_rps_record_flow() is for connected sockets Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 6:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 7:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 17:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 14:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 18:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-08 19:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 19:20 ` Edward Cree
2016-12-08 17:49 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 18:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 19:15 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 20:05 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-08 20:30 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 20:44 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 7:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 13:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 15:47 ` David Miller
2016-12-07 17:09 ` [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed David Laight
2016-12-07 17:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 17:37 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-07 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 17:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 15:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1481017989.6225.21.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).