netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:34:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481020451.6225.38.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480960639.18162.556.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>

Hi Eric,

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:57 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> In UDP recvmsg() path we currently access 3 cache lines from an skb
> while holding receive queue lock, plus another one if packet is
> dequeued, since we need to change skb->next->prev
> 
> 1st cache line (contains ->next/prev pointers, offsets 0x00 and 0x08)
> 2nd cache line (skb->len & skb->peeked, offsets 0x80 and 0x8e)
> 3rd cache line (skb->truesize/users, offsets 0xe0 and 0xe4)
> 
> skb->peeked is only needed to make sure 0-length packets are properly
> handled while MSG_PEEK is operated.
> 
> I had first the intent to remove skb->peeked but the "MSG_PEEK at
> non-zero offset" support added by Sam Kumar makes this not possible.
> 
> This patch avoids one cache line miss during the locked section, when
> skb->len and skb->peeked do not have to be read.
> 
> It also avoids the skb_set_peeked() cost for non empty UDP datagrams.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Thank you for all the good work.

After all your improvement, I see the cacheline miss in inet_recvmsg()
as a major perf offender for the user space process in the udp flood
scenario due to skc_rxhash sharing the same sk_drops cacheline.

Using an udp-specific drop counter (and an sk_drops accessor to wrap
sk_drops access where needed), we could avoid such cache miss. With that
- patch for udp.h only below - I get 3% improvement on top of all the
pending udp patches, and the gain should be more relevant after the 2
queues rework. What do you think ?

Cheers,

Paolo.
---
diff --git a/include/linux/udp.h b/include/linux/udp.h
index d1fd8cd..2bbf5db 100644
--- a/include/linux/udp.h
+++ b/include/linux/udp.h
@@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ struct udp_sock {
        unsigned int     corkflag;      /* Cork is required */
        __u8             encap_type;    /* Is this an Encapsulation socket? */
        unsigned char    no_check6_tx:1,/* Send zero UDP6 checksums on TX? */
-                        no_check6_rx:1;/* Allow zero UDP6 checksums on RX? */
+                        no_check6_rx:1,/* Allow zero UDP6 checksums on RX? */
+                        pcflag:6;      /* UDP-Lite specific, moved here to */
+                                       /* fill an hole, marks socket as */
+                                       /* UDP-Lite if > 0    */
+
        /*
         * Following member retains the information to create a UDP header
         * when the socket is uncorked.
@@ -64,8 +68,7 @@ struct udp_sock {
 #define UDPLITE_BIT      0x1           /* set by udplite proto init function */
 #define UDPLITE_SEND_CC  0x2           /* set via udplite setsockopt         */
 #define UDPLITE_RECV_CC  0x4           /* set via udplite setsocktopt        */
-       __u8             pcflag;        /* marks socket as UDP-Lite if > 0    */
-       __u8             unused[3];
+
        /*
         * For encapsulation sockets.
         */
@@ -79,6 +82,9 @@ struct udp_sock {
        int                     (*gro_complete)(struct sock *sk,
                                                struct sk_buff *skb,
                                                int nhoff);
+
+       /* since we are prone to drops, avoid dirtying any sk cacheline */
+       atomic_t                drops ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 };
 
 static inline struct udp_sock *udp_sk(const struct sock *sk)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-06 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05  2:43 [RFC] udp: some improvements on RX path Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 13:22 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-05 14:28   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 15:37     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-05 15:54       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-05 17:57     ` [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06  9:53       ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 12:10         ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 14:35           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 14:34         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 10:34       ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2016-12-06 17:08         ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 17:47           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 18:31             ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 18:58               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 19:16                 ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-06 19:35                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07  3:32                     ` [PATCH net-next] net: sock_rps_record_flow() is for connected sockets Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07  6:47                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07  7:57                         ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 14:26                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 17:49                             ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 14:29                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 15:59                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 18:50                             ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-08 19:32                               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 19:20                           ` Edward Cree
2016-12-08 17:49                         ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 18:02                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-08 19:15                             ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 20:05                               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-08 20:30                                 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 20:44                                 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 18:07                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07  7:59                       ` Paolo Abeni
2016-12-07 13:58                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 15:47                       ` David Miller
2016-12-07 17:09           ` [PATCH] net/udp: do not touch skb->peeked unless really needed David Laight
2016-12-07 17:32             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 17:37               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-07 17:52                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-07 17:55                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-06 15:42       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1481020451.6225.38.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).