From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Soft lockup in inet_put_port on 4.6
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:05:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481565929.24490.0@smtp.office365.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481343298.4930.208.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 19:47 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>>
>> Hmm... Is your ephemeral port range includes the port your load
>> balancing app is using ?
>
> I suspect that you might have processes doing bind( port = 0) that are
> trapped into the bind_conflict() scan ?
>
> With 100,000 + timewaits there, this possibly hurts.
>
> Can you try the following loop breaker ?
It doesn't appear that the app is doing bind(port = 0) during normal
operation. I tested this patch and it made no difference. I'm going
to test simply restarting the app without changing to the SO_REUSEPORT
option. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-12 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 23:06 Soft lockup in inet_put_port on 4.6 Tom Herbert
2016-12-08 21:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-08 21:36 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-09 0:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-09 1:01 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-10 1:59 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-10 3:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-10 4:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-12 18:05 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2016-12-12 18:44 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-12 21:23 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-12 22:24 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-13 20:51 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-13 23:03 ` Craig Gallek
2016-12-13 23:32 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-15 18:53 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-15 22:39 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-15 23:25 ` Craig Gallek
2016-12-16 0:07 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-16 14:54 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 15:21 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 22:08 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-16 22:18 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-16 22:50 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-17 11:08 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-17 13:26 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 1:56 ` David Miller
2016-12-20 2:07 ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-20 2:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-20 3:40 ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 4:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-20 4:59 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1481565929.24490.0@smtp.office365.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).