netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>, <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
	<kraigatgoog@gmail.com>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	<tom@herbertland.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5 net-next] inet: kill smallest_size and smallest_port
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:07:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482264424-15439-3-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1482264424-15439-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com>

In inet_csk_get_port we seem to be using smallest_port to figure out where the
best place to look for a SO_REUSEPORT sk that matches with an existing set of
SO_REUSEPORT's.  However if we get to the logic

if (smallest_size != -1) {
	port = smallest_port;
	goto have_port;
}

we will do a useless search, because we would have already done the
inet_csk_bind_conflict for that port and it would have returned 1, otherwise we
would have gone to found_tb and succeeded.  Since this logic makes us do yet
another trip through inet_csk_bind_conflict for a port we know won't work just
delete this code and save us the time.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 26 ++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 74f6a57..1a1a94bd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ int inet_csk_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum)
 	bool reuse = sk->sk_reuse && sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN;
 	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
 	int ret = 1, attempts = 5, port = snum;
-	int smallest_size = -1, smallest_port;
 	struct inet_bind_hashbucket *head;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 	int i, low, high, attempt_half;
@@ -103,7 +102,6 @@ int inet_csk_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum)
 	bool reuseport_ok = !!snum;
 
 	if (port) {
-have_port:
 		head = &hinfo->bhash[inet_bhashfn(net, port,
 						  hinfo->bhash_size)];
 		spin_lock_bh(&head->lock);
@@ -137,8 +135,6 @@ other_half_scan:
 	 * We do the opposite to not pollute connect() users.
 	 */
 	offset |= 1U;
-	smallest_size = -1;
-	smallest_port = low; /* avoid compiler warning */
 
 other_parity_scan:
 	port = low + offset;
@@ -152,15 +148,6 @@ other_parity_scan:
 		spin_lock_bh(&head->lock);
 		inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb, &head->chain)
 			if (net_eq(ib_net(tb), net) && tb->port == port) {
-				if (((tb->fastreuse > 0 && reuse) ||
-				     (tb->fastreuseport > 0 &&
-				      sk->sk_reuseport &&
-				      !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
-				      uid_eq(tb->fastuid, uid))) &&
-				    (tb->num_owners < smallest_size || smallest_size == -1)) {
-					smallest_size = tb->num_owners;
-					smallest_port = port;
-				}
 				if (!inet_csk_bind_conflict(sk, tb, false, reuseport_ok))
 					goto tb_found;
 				goto next_port;
@@ -171,10 +158,6 @@ next_port:
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
-	if (smallest_size != -1) {
-		port = smallest_port;
-		goto have_port;
-	}
 	offset--;
 	if (!(offset & 1))
 		goto other_parity_scan;
@@ -196,19 +179,18 @@ tb_found:
 		if (sk->sk_reuse == SK_FORCE_REUSE)
 			goto success;
 
-		if (((tb->fastreuse > 0 && reuse) ||
+		if ((tb->fastreuse > 0 && reuse) ||
 		     (tb->fastreuseport > 0 &&
 		      !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
-		      sk->sk_reuseport && uid_eq(tb->fastuid, uid))) &&
-		    smallest_size == -1)
+		      sk->sk_reuseport && uid_eq(tb->fastuid, uid)))
 			goto success;
 		if (inet_csk_bind_conflict(sk, tb, true, reuseport_ok)) {
 			if ((reuse ||
 			     (tb->fastreuseport > 0 &&
 			      sk->sk_reuseport &&
 			      !rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb) &&
-			      uid_eq(tb->fastuid, uid))) &&
-			    !snum && smallest_size != -1 && --attempts >= 0) {
+			      uid_eq(tb->fastuid, uid))) && !snum &&
+			    --attempts >= 0) {
 				spin_unlock_bh(&head->lock);
 				goto again;
 			}
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-20 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-20 20:06 [RFC][PATCH 0/5 net-next] Rework inet_csk_get_port Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/5 net-next] inet: replace ->bind_conflict with ->rcv_saddr_equal Josef Bacik
2016-12-21 15:06   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-21 15:16     ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-22 20:00       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-21 15:23   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-21 15:59     ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-21 18:28   ` David Miller
2016-12-20 20:07 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2016-12-21 18:30   ` [PATCH 2/5 net-next] inet: kill smallest_size and smallest_port David Miller
2016-12-21 19:29     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-21 19:32     ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/5 net-next] inet: don't check for bind conflicts twice when searching for a port Josef Bacik
2016-12-21 15:08   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-12-21 15:12     ` Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 20:07 ` [PATCH 4/5 net-next] inet: split inet_csk_get_port into two functions Josef Bacik
2016-12-20 20:07 ` [PATCH 5/5 net-next] inet: reset tb->fastreuseport when adding a reuseport sk Josef Bacik
2016-12-21 16:49   ` Craig Gallek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1482264424-15439-3-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kraigatgoog@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).