From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: [patch net 2/3] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't reflect dead neighs Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:32:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1482481970-2327-3-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> References: <1482481970-2327-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Cc: davem@davemloft.net, idosch@mellanox.com, eladr@mellanox.com, yotamg@mellanox.com, nogahf@mellanox.com, arkadis@mellanox.com To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wj0-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:36857 "EHLO mail-wj0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755008AbcLWIcz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 03:32:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wj0-f196.google.com with SMTP id j10so39230568wjb.3 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:32:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1482481970-2327-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ido Schimmel When a neighbour is considered to be dead, we should remove it from the device's table regardless of its NUD state. Without this patch, after setting a port to be administratively down we get the following errors when we periodically try to update the kernel about neighbours activity: [ 461.947268] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:03:00.0 sw1p3: Failed to find matching neighbour for IP=192.168.100.2 Fixes: a6bf9e933daf ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Offload neighbours based on NUD state change") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c index 53126bf..a0f9742 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_neigh_update_hw(struct work_struct *work) char rauht_pl[MLXSW_REG_RAUHT_LEN]; struct net_device *dev; bool entry_connected; - u8 nud_state; + u8 nud_state, dead; bool updating; bool removing; bool adding; @@ -953,10 +953,11 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_neigh_update_hw(struct work_struct *work) dip = ntohl(*((__be32 *) n->primary_key)); memcpy(neigh_entry->ha, n->ha, sizeof(neigh_entry->ha)); nud_state = n->nud_state; + dead = n->dead; dev = n->dev; read_unlock_bh(&n->lock); - entry_connected = nud_state & NUD_VALID; + entry_connected = nud_state & NUD_VALID && !dead; adding = (!neigh_entry->offloaded) && entry_connected; updating = neigh_entry->offloaded && entry_connected; removing = neigh_entry->offloaded && !entry_connected; @@ -1351,7 +1352,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_nexthop_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry *neigh_entry; struct net_device *dev = fib_nh->nh_dev; struct neighbour *n; - u8 nud_state; + u8 nud_state, dead; /* Take a reference of neigh here ensuring that neigh would * not be detructed before the nexthop entry is finished. @@ -1383,8 +1384,9 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_nexthop_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, list_add_tail(&nh->neigh_list_node, &neigh_entry->nexthop_list); read_lock_bh(&n->lock); nud_state = n->nud_state; + dead = n->dead; read_unlock_bh(&n->lock); - __mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_update(nh, !(nud_state & NUD_VALID)); + __mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_update(nh, !(nud_state & NUD_VALID && !dead)); return 0; } -- 2.7.4