From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wexu@redhat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next V3 0/3] vhost_net tx batching
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:20:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483075251-6889-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi:
This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was
done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend
(e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and
submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation.
Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over
mlx4(noqueue) on host:
Mpps -+%
rx_batched=0 0.90 +0%
rx_batched=4 0.97 +7.8%
rx_batched=8 0.97 +7.8%
rx_batched=16 0.98 +8.9%
rx_batched=32 1.03 +14.4%
rx_batched=48 1.09 +21.1%
rx_batched=64 1.02 +13.3%
Changes from V2:
- remove uselss queue limitation check (and we don't drop any packet now)
Changes from V1:
- drop NAPI handler since we don't use NAPI now
- fix the issues that may exceeds max pending of zerocopy
- more improvement on available buffer detection
- move the limitation of batched pacekts from vhost to tuntap
Please review.
Thanks
Jason Wang (3):
vhost: better detection of available buffers
vhost_net: tx batching
tun: rx batching
drivers/net/tun.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 ++++++--
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-12-30 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-30 5:20 Jason Wang [this message]
2016-12-30 5:20 ` [PATCH net-next V3 1/3] vhost: better detection of available buffers Jason Wang
2016-12-30 5:20 ` [PATCH net-next V3 2/3] vhost_net: tx batching Jason Wang
2016-12-30 5:20 ` [PATCH net-next V3 3/3] tun: rx batching Jason Wang
2016-12-31 17:31 ` David Miller
2017-01-03 3:12 ` Jason Wang
2016-12-31 21:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-03 3:18 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483075251-6889-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).